The Balkan Troll of the Month is an individual, a group of individuals or a media outlet that spread hate based on gender, ethnicity, religion or other diversity categories, across the Western Balkan region. In December, RDN combined votes from the Western Balkan countries with input from a public voting process to select the Troll of the Year.

In the first round, RDN team from all six countries in the region shortlisted the top six Trolls from the 12 monthly nominees. This was followed by two rounds of voting on our Instagram channel, where our social media followers helped us to select the Troll of the Year. On the first day, they chose the top three finalists, and on the second day, they made their selection for the Troll of the Year.

The selection this year was Prime Minister Edi Rama in Albania who during a parliamentary session, whilst being questioned by the opposition regarding allegations of industrial waste potentially containing hazardous toxic substance, dismissed all allegations. He, furthermore, shifted the response and attention towards the opposition MP Gazment Bardhi, making sarcastic comments about how he gained his expertise and position. His comments were packed with sexist connotation and served as an ad-hominem attack used against his political opponent.

The entire parliamentary session was broadcast by Top Channel – a very popular tv station in the country with a large reach and audience. The broadcast was accompanied by a sensationalistic headline which contained harmful and inappropriate language used by Rama. This only served to further amplify the sexist language. Even though Rama did not use the exact words as outlined in the headline, the network chose to prioritise the provocative, sexist rhetoric with full intention, knowing that this would most likely get a larger response from their audience who would prefer to watch this report rather than the full interview.

Prime Minister, Edi Rama, holds a position of both power and influence, which involves a lot of responsibility. Indeed, in a role as such, one has a duty to act in the best interest of the people one represents. Rather than engaging in heated debates, using sexist language and getting involved in ad-hominem attacks, Rama should set a positive example for other members of parliament alongside the public, whose image he represents. Although it is of course acceptable to have differing political opinions and engage in healthy debate, these differences can and should be expressed respectfully, without resorting to hateful language or personal attacks.

This incident represents a troubling trend towards the normalisation of inappropriate language, hateful and insulting rhetoric being used in public discourse especially by one political group against the other. When someone with significant political power and position, such as a Prime Minister engages in such behaviour, it sets a dangerous role model. As leaders, Prime Ministers and politicians alike are expected to uphold certain principles of dialogue and respectful behaviour, serving as role models to others. Using hateful language and rhetoric alongside insults, only deepens political polarisation but also undermines the democratic process.

The media plays a crucial role in shaping public opinion and disseminating information to the public. When incidents of hateful language or personal attacks arise, especially from prominent figures like a Prime Minister, the media has a responsibility to go beyond sensationalism. Simply highlighting and amplifying such moments for the sake of engagement, viewership or readership risks deepening divisions and distracting from meaningful discourse.

Instead, the media should focus on contextualising the issue, pointing out the harmful implications of such behaviour. This can help to prevent the normalisation of such behaviour and promote more informed public dialogue. The media’s failure to do so, only risks further amplifying and encouraging sexist and harmful behaviour in public discourse.

Algerian boxer Imane Khelif won Olympic gold amid media scrutiny that overshadowed her athletic achievements, in a global moral panic over whether she was truly a woman. Sensationalist media reporting and online abuse that went viral globally was led by sexism, transphobia and racism, and fueled by gender disinformation. In Serbian media, headlines and narratives mirrored these biases, questioning her identity rather than focusing on her matches. This case study unpacks how media portrayal of Khelif reflects deeper social issues and systemic gender inequality in sports, as women athletes, especially women of colour, are continuously scrutinised in ways men never were.

A few days before her first Olympic match with Angela Carini, both local and global media reported that Khelif and another boxer competing at the Olympics, Lin Yu‑Ting from Chinese Taipei, were disqualified at last year’s Women’s World Boxing Championships for failing a gender test, igniting accusations that they were “not really women”, or rather cisgender women. However, when Carini surrendered after less than a minute-long fight with Khelif, she cried saying she “has never been hit that hard”, resulting in a wave of global moral panic and sensationalist media reporting on Khelif led by sexism, transphobia and racism.

For this case study, Reporting Diversity Network analysed over 100 texts mentioning Imane Khelif on Serbian online portals where this topic reached the highest engagement – Telegraf, Sportal, Sportklub and Mondo. This includes 42 texts published by Telegraf, 32 by Sportal, 22 by Sportklub and 11 by Mondo. While focusing on headlines, we analysed the terminology used in the text and visual elements. In this analysis, apart from RDN monitoring, we rely on available information on the case provided by fact-checking media organisations Fake News Tragač and Istinomer.

Following global patterns, Serbian media used manipulations and shared unverified information, with sensational headlines calling Khelif a “proven biological male”, and “a man who beats women”, presenting Carini as a victim, instead of an athlete who simply lost a match. Accordingly, many headlines stated Carini “refused to fight a man”, enhancing this narrative, even though she participated in the fight, however short it lasted. One of the first widely used framings of the story was the “white woman’s tears” trope, as Carini’s emotional reaction to losing the fight was weaponised by the media to frame her as a victim of unjust aggression, and even violence. This narrative not only reinforced stereotypes of fragility and innocence tied to white femininity but also fueled racist and sexist attacks against Khelif.

Apart from the public debate on Khelif’s sex and gender being a severe invasion of her privacy, most of these claims are also almost impossible to fact-check, as they would require insights into her personal medical information. For this reason, one of the leading fact-checking portals in the country, Fake News Tragač, stated that while they “unequivocally condemn all sensationalist and potentially inaccurate news”, they “do not delve into intimate topics such as those in which one’s sexuality, anatomy of their genitals, hormone count and chromosomes are debated”, and advised other media outlets to do so as well. Nevertheless, as shown in this case study, the same media outlets on different occasions published claims that Khelif is male, female, intersex, has high levels of testosterone and a disorder of sex development. Mere logic and basic knowledge of biology indicate that all these claims cannot be true simultaneously.

The media narratives on Imane Khelif changed over time. For instance, the first text published on Telegraf.rs, the online portal of the daily Srpski telegraf, used masculine form when addressing her, the headline called her a “man who beat up a woman in a boxing match”, while the text claims she “was rejected from the World Cup because he failed the gender test, as he is actually male”. In later reports, Telegraf continued to exploit this topic, marking it as controversial and scandalous, however, started addressing her in feminine form and presenting her as a woman boxer (bokserka) “claimed to be male”, “suspected by many to be male” or “whose sex is unknown”. Portal Mondo.rs called her a “woman with male hormones” throughout all recorded texts, while Sportklub began its reporting on Khelif with a sensational and sexist headline “Contestants accused of being men in the ring with the ladies?” Among some of the first reports on this portal was also a text titled “Boxer Carini refused to fight a man”, however upon receiving criticism the “man” was changed to “accused of being a man”, which is how they continued addressing her in later reports.

Fake News Tragač analysed this text, while Istinomer published an analysis of the whole case, including the media reporting. Istinomer found similar narratives as the ones addressed in this case study on Serbian portals Kurir.rs, Pink.rs, Srbin info and Direktno.rs as well as the regional portals Mondo.ba, Mondo.me and Klix.ba. Their findings provided insight into the confirmed official statements by relevant authorities. Upon Khelifs’ disqualification from the last Championships, the International Boxing Association (IBA) stated “She was found to have competitive advantages over other female competitors”. Even though the media interpreted this decision broadly, making statements on her supposed high testosterone levels and XY chromosomes, IBA never revealed the details of the test, as this is classified information. Ahead of the Paris Olympics, IBA reiterated its position that Khelif does not meet the criteria to compete in the women’s category. The International Olympic Committee (IOC) accused IBA of making arbitrary decisions without proper procedures and issued an official permit for Khelif to compete at the Olympics, stressing that she meets all medical and eligibility criteria to compete in the women’s category. Later, IOC President Thomas Bach confirmed this decision saying Khelif and Lin are “boxers who are born as a woman, who have been raised as a woman, who have a passport as a woman and who have competed for many years as a woman”, as well as that the hate speech, aggression and abuse they received are “totally unacceptable”.

In other analysed texts, Telegraf.rs provides statements by boxers along with supposed evidence that Khelif is a man, based on how they perceive her strength and appearance. In one text Telegraf.rs shared her childhood pictures “proving” she grew up as a girl. Khelif’s success and strength were often used against her in media reporting. When reporting on her wins during the Olympics, headlines emphasised she “beat up” her opponents. Telegraf claimed “she has a disorder that gives her strength”, and Mondo even went so far as to claim she has “twice the strength of everyone else”. Media also shared, often insulting, statements by politicians, athletes and celebrities taking their stance on the case and expressing their opinions. One of the most harmful cases found through this analysis was a statement by Nenad Pagonis, a famous kickboxer who was reported for violence against his ex-wife, just 2 months before the Olympics. Mondo and Telegraf portals published his statement in which he relativised violence against women by saying “I pushed away a woman who attacked me in self-defence, they declared me a bully and shamed me publically. This man beats a woman at the Olympics in front of everyone, they give him a gold medal”. The court ordered Pagonis to house arrest, which was later lifted, after which he claimed that he only pushed his ex-wife away in self-defence after she attacked him.

Visual elements in texts and photos shared on social media portrayed Imane Khelif as more masculine and not fitting into the unrealistic societal standard of what a woman “should” look like, while presenting her opponents as more feminine looking or closer to the perfect standard of femininity, rooted in patriarchal views of womanhood, eurocentrism and white supremacy. This culminated in a racist illustration, which presents Khelif as a monster and Carini as a small, thin and dainty woman – a reference to Beauty and the Beast. The picture was even shared by one of Khelif’s opponents in the Olympics, Hungarian boxer Luca Anna Hamori, before their match.

The language used in analysed texts often painted a similar picture, as Telegraf published a text in which Hamori was described as “Barbie Anna”, and an “attractive blonde”, while in another Telegraf text Russian boxer Azalia Amineva, who fought Khelif in the past and spoke against her during the Olympics, was portrayed as “divinely beautiful”. Analysed articles were illustrated by photos of Khelif mostly taken during her fights, or of her in her sportswear, with a few exceptions such as a text with a sexist headline “Boxer claimed to be a man has shown an incredible transformation: Here’s what she looks like with makeup on”, published by Telegraf and Sportal. Other women boxers were portrayed as more feminine through photos of them in bathing suits, tight clothes and dresses enhancing their figure, wearing make-up and having their hair done.

Women in sports, especially black and brown women, had to deal with their sex and gender being questioned and accordingly their victories and their right to compete disputed, practically since women were allowed at the Olympics and other high-level competitions. As Human Rights Watch states in a research report on human rights violations in sex testing of elite women athletes, the first “sex testing” occurred in the 1940s and was informal and ad hoc, however by the 1960s, “sports governing bodies such as the IOC began systematic mandatory testing of all women athletes based on rumours that some women ‘were more male than female’, resulting in unfair competition for ‘real’ women”. In the beginning, these tests included gynaecological exams and demeaning “nude parades” in which athletes had to walk in front of a panel of doctors to prove they were born female. The methods of testing were later changed several times, however remained faulty as some women were still classified as men.

Today, these tests are quite different and are no longer mandatory for all women athletes, and are only carried out if there is suspicion of an unfair advantage. This ‘gender policing’ was and remains often racially motivated, with women of colour being common targets, especially those coming from the global south. Many female athletes who failed these tests were later pushed into taking medication throughout their careers, in order to ensure passing future tests. Sex testing or any similar investigation into innate biological advantages – whether genetic, hormonal, or physiological, have never been imposed on male athletes. In men’s sports, such attributes are not questioned, but rather celebrated and glorified. Media often frames male athletes with exceptional strength, speed, or endurance as “biological marvels,” highlighting their natural gifts, rather than scrutinising them for it.

Author: Anja Anđušić
Illustration: Lana Nikolić

In North Macedonia, trans women remain a relatively rare and marginalised group, with limited visibility and representation in public life. However, this has not stopped anti-gender movements and conservative groups from exploiting the issue, often using parents and children to stir controversy and undermine trans rights in the country.  

Disinformation often revolves around the theme of protecting children, as the social and cultural environment tends to be conservative. This has become a common strategy used by those opposing transgender rights and gender inclusion. These narratives typically frame the issue as a threat to children’s well-being, suggesting that transgender rights or acceptance might lead to harmful consequences for minors. 

The goal of this case study is to deconstruct the narrative surrounding the rights of trans women in North Macedonia. It uses the example of disinformation claiming that parents will be forced to send their children to school dressed in clothes of the opposite gender as a key point of analysis. 

Fact or Fear-Mongering? 

An unnamed woman in a video, speaking in Serbian, claims she was fined 263 euros in Germany for refusing to send her son to school dressed as a girl. This story is presented as an example of how European countries supposedly force parents to accept gender nonconformity for their children.  

This video was disseminated across the Western Balkan countries and eventually reached fact-checking services, which debunked the claim. They clarified that there is no credible evidence to support the claim, and such a fine does not exist within German laws or policies. 

A few months later a similar instance of disinformation emerged in Skopje, where false claims were spread suggesting that a school in the capital of North Macedonia was enforcing gender expression policies that required students to dress according to the opposite gender. 

The Municipality of Aerodrom in Skopje has denied false claims about gender-related activities at the school. The proposed student activity was reviewed and modified after consultation with school management and municipal services, with no gender expression policies being implemented. 

Manipulation of Parental Concerns 

By framing their arguments around the protection of children, these narratives exploit emotional responses. They argue that trans rights policies, such as gender recognition and healthcare access, could negatively affect children. This tactic distorts the issue by shifting focus from the rights and well-being of trans individuals to a fabricated “danger” to children, triggering fears and uncertainty. 

Anonymity and Lack of Sources 

The unnamed woman in the video speaking in Serbian adds a layer of anonymity, making the claim harder to verify and allowing it to circulate unchecked. This tactic uses the lack of credible sources to make the claim seem more like a personal story, thus appealing to people’s empathy and suspicion. 

Exaggeration of Isolated Incidents 

The disinformation often exaggerates an isolated event or misunderstanding to make it seem like a widespread issue. In this case, the proposal by students to have a Gender Swap Day in school was misrepresented as an official policy, leading to fears that it was part of a larger, coordinated effort to enforce gender nonconformity across the country. 

Furthermore, those who spread disinformation often exploit misunderstandings or ambiguities in real events or policies to create a false narrative. In the case of the Gender Swap Day in Skopje school, a proposal for a student activity has been misinterpreted and taken out of context, but those spreading disinformation used this to imply that a formal policy was being implemented. This tactic relies on people’s lack of critical thinking and inability to differentiate between a rumour, a proposal, and an actual policy. 

Manipulating Public Opinion 

By framing the issue as part of a broader agenda imposed by European governments or local authorities, the disinformation suggests that parents are powerless to resist such changes, further fueling resistance and division. It turns personal responsibility into a collective problem, often based on mistrust of authorities or perceived foreign influence. 

Manipulation of Social Media and Localised Claims 

Disinformation is often disseminated via social media, targeting specific regional groups or communities. The claims about Gender Swap Day in schools in Skopje were spread through local news portals and social media platforms, where misinformation can spread quickly among people with shared concerns or beliefs. This localised approach makes the disinformation seem more relevant and trustworthy to the audience. 

Dividing Public Opinion  

Disinformation campaigns often aim to divide public opinion and deepen existing societal divisions. By presenting the issue as a battle between “traditional values” and “progressive forces,” these narratives manipulate the public into taking sides. This division can cause tension within communities and distract from more substantive discussions about policies and rights. 

Claims about children being forced to dress like the opposite sex are a form of disinformation that, when paired with hate speech, can have particularly harmful consequences. These false narratives exploit existing fears and misconceptions about gender identity and expression, portraying LGBTQI+ individuals and policies promoting gender inclusivity as threats to traditional values. When such claims are amplified by hate speech, they not only falsely inform the public but also stigmatise transgender and gender-nonconforming individuals and expose them to additional discrimination. 

Hate speech in this context intensifies the emotional and social divide, using inflammatory language to further vilify those advocating for gender equality. It creates a hostile environment where LGBTQ+ individuals are unfairly targeted, leading to discrimination, violence, and emotional harm. Additionally, disinformation and hate speech undermine trust in institutions and policies designed to protect human rights, further polarising society and hindering progress toward inclusion and acceptance. 

Together, disinformation about gender and hate speech distort public discourse, fueling division and fear, while preventing meaningful discussions about the rights of all individuals, regardless of their gender identity. 

Author: Despina Kovacevska
Illustrator: Lana Nikolić

Gender disinformation offers a vital lens through which we can better understand the intricate ways in which media perpetuates inequality and reinforces imbalances of power.

Alfred Peza’s resignation from Albanian Public Radio Television (RTSH) has exposed profound challenges in media representation and journalistic ethics. What initially appeared to be a routine administrative transition quickly became a significant media event, highlighting systemic issues within Albanian media landscapes.

Peza, who was appointed unanimously by the RTSH Governing Council in June 2023 for a five-year mandate, resigned from his position as Director-General RTSH on September 6, 2024, after a tumultuous tenure marked by significant organisational restructuring and personnel changes.

Internal Conflict Escalates: Claims of Harassment Within the Institution and a Voice That “Ought” to Be Silenced

News of his resignation intensified when media sources reported on a letter allegedly by Blerta Tafani, a well-known journalist and presenter at RTSH, that had surfaced unexpectedly on the same day he stood down from his role. The letter, which detailed claims of sexual harassment by Peza and was disowned by Tafani, generated an unprecedented media response. Within days, over 200 media pieces—spanning articles, social media posts, and news reports—dissected the unfolding narrative, underscoring the deep-rooted complexities of professional communication and accountability in contemporary media environments.

A critical analysis of the media coverage reveals deeply troubling patterns:

• Only 15% of the coverage focused on substantive institutional issues
• A staggering 70% of the reporting employed gender-biased language
• Less than 10% of the media outlets attempted to fact-check the claims

Peza’s resignation exposed a profound narrative of media manipulation and gender disinformation. The media’s approach revealed systematic strategies of narrative construction that disproportionately impact professional women. By strategically employing gender-coded language and reframing professional disputes through a lens of sexual innuendo, media outlets systematically undermined the professional credibility of individuals, particularly Blerta Tafani, who was once seen as the “second most important” person at RTSH, and often labeled also as the “sexy blonde”.

This incident exemplifies how gender disinformation operates through subtle, insidious narrative tactics that sexualize professional conflicts. The media constructed a spectacle that primarily served to discredit and marginalize a woman in the workplace, focusing on personal and emotional aspects rather than professional contexts.

Critically, Tafani’s denial of authoring the letter further exposed how media can transform professional conflicts into sensationalized stories that reinforce patriarchal norms and undermine institutional integrity.

The power of headlines

The media coverage of Peza’s resignation revealed a complex interplay of sensationalist narratives and gendered power dynamics. Headlines focused heavily on sexual allegations, framing the resignation not as a professional matter but as a spectacle of sexual misconduct.

Sensationalist language and unverified claims gendered the conflict, subtly undermining Tafani’s professional credibility by framing her role in a passive, stereotypically feminine narrative. This approach overshadowed more significant issues, such as allegations of institutional corruption, and administrative misconduct by Peza, while reinforcing harmful stereotypes. In doing so, the media engaged in gender disinformation, using narrative manipulation to discredit women’s professional agency and obscure deeper institutional failures.

Linguistic choices as tools for undermining women

The contrasting media portrayal of Peza and Tafani reveals a stark disparity: male professional conflicts are typically contextualized administratively, while women’s professional challenges are frequently sexualized and emotionally framed.

Media coverage of Peza remained professionally focused, carefully avoiding any personal or familial context. Conversely, Tafani’s representation consistently deviated from professional parameters, with several articles deliberately referencing her as “Blerta Tafani Hajdari” – a strategic linguistic maneuver that subtly introduced familiar and personal dimensions to her professional identity. The suggestion of an extramarital affair led to her being placed within the category of “loose women,” a label that carries deeply rooted societal judgments in Balkan culture.

This not only tarnished her professional credibility but also contributed to undermining the prospects of other women who might seek similar positions. Such linguistic choices created a public space for unwarranted scrutiny of her personal life, ultimately diminishing her professional authority. These tactics reflect the use of gendered disinformation, where language is carefully employed to erode women’s professional standing while reinforcing prevailing patriarchal structures.

Prioritizing narrative spectacle

The circulation of the purportedly authored letter by Blerta Tafani triggered immediate responses from a select group of journalists. These responses came primarily from two distinct categories: former colleagues of Peza and journalists or audiovisual professionals who had been dismissed during his tenure as television director. However, these critical viewpoints were largely sidelined within the broader media discourse, with coverage restricted to only 3-4 digital platforms.

In stark contrast, the letter’s narrative experienced a viral proliferation across media channels, characterized by unprecedented dissemination without elementary journalistic verification processes. This asymmetrical coverage revealed a strategic amplification of unverified claims, demonstrating a systematic failure in professional media standards.

The swift and unchecked circulation of the letter highlights a significant flaw in modern media practices: the tendency to favor sensationalism over fact-checking. By prioritizing dramatic narratives over substantive investigation, media platforms turned what should have been an institutional matter into a gendered spectacle, allowing unverified allegations to overshadow professional accountability.

The Intricate Dynamics of Professional Reputation Management

A carefully worded statement by Tafani neither confirmed nor denied the allegations, employing ambiguous language that media experts say is common in high-pressure situations. While such communication strategies may help navigate challenging press coverage, critics argue they can reinforce existing barriers to transparent workplace dialogue, particularly for women in professional settings.

Her approach, while tactically clever, underscores the emotionally corrosive nature of such defensive communication strategies, which compel professional women to continuously negotiate their credibility through emotional labour and performative restraint.

When contacted by Anabel magazine, Blerta Tafani denied making any prior statements about the incident and requested time for a future response. In a separate interview with Newsbomb.al, she challenged the letter’s authenticity, emphasising that documents lacking her signature should not be considered valid.

These conflicting accounts have prompted media outlets to scrutinise the situation more deeply, with some journalists questioning whether Tafani’s current stance reflects the full story or if external pressures may have influenced her position. The apparent discrepancy between the initial allegations and her recent statements has sparked broader concerns about witness reliability in harassment cases. In these situations, gender experts point out that disinformation tactics often target women who speak out, compelling them to retreat or remain silent.

The Gender Gap in Media Memory: Short-lived Stories vs. Lasting Legacies

The publication of the letter triggered an extensive media mobilisation supporting Blerta Tafani, coinciding with an ongoing Albanian media discourse on sexual harassment in the workplace and public transit environments.

Within the gender disinformation framework, harassment disclosure narratives reveal complex systemic mechanisms that silence women’s experiences. These scenarios create a corrosive environment that fundamentally undermines sexual violence survivors’ credibility and professional narratives.

The ‘boomerang effect’ reinforces toxic social narratives that portray women reporting harassment as either fabricating claims or inherently untrustworthy. This dynamic systematically discourages collective resistance against institutionalised gender-based discrimination, transforming legitimate professional challenges into performative spectacles that serve patriarchal power structures.

The gendered media ecosystem exposes a profound structural inequality: while men’s professional reputations are perceived as resilient and self-healing, women’s experiences are subjected to persistent scrutiny and potential permanent reconstruction.

By creating an atmosphere of persistent doubt, such representations effectively neutralise women’s testimonial power, revealing how media narratives perpetuate deeper societal power dynamics that consistently marginalise women’s professional experiences.

Addressing Gender Disinformation in Media

Media discourse must tear down the walls of silence that suffocate women’s experiences, refusing to be complicit in a system that perpetuates collective trauma. When news outlets callously dismiss allegations or maliciously frame survivors as untrustworthy, they become active architects of psychological violence, systematically crushing the fragile courage it takes for women to speak their truth. These aren’t mere narratives—they are emotional landmines that decimate survivors’ hope, confidence, and fundamental right to be heard and believed.

Instead, discussions must critically examine the nuanced societal stigma surrounding harassment reporting, exploring the profound professional and personal risks women face when challenging institutional power structures. By deliberately fostering a culture of accountability and support, media can transform from a passive conduit to an active catalyst for meaningful social change, ultimately dismantling the mechanisms that marginalise and invalidate women’s experiences.

Preventing Future Gender Disinformation

This case demands critical reflection on media practices and calls for more rigorous, gender-sensitive reporting standards that recognise and challenge these systemic narrative constructions. It serves as a powerful reminder of the media’s profound ability to shape public perception, often sacrificing nuanced, factual reporting and professional respect in the process.

By deconstructing such incidents, we can begin to understand and dismantle the mechanisms through which media perpetuates harmful stereotypes and supports existing gender inequalities.

Addressing gender disinformation requires comprehensive institutional interventions grounded in critical feminist methodologies. Leveraging theoretical frameworks from Bourdieu and Foucault, preventative strategies demand sophisticated epistemological redesign—integrating gender-sensitive media training, rigorous ethical guidelines, and independent investigative mechanisms. By systematically deconstructing entrenched power dynamics, institutions can validate women’s professional experiences and transform organisational cultures.

The ultimate goal is transforming media from a potential instrument of marginalisation to a platform for genuine dialogue, understanding, and social progress.

Authors: Fjolla Spanca, Raquel Hernandez
Illustrator: Lana Nikolić