Author: Ivana Jelača
MATTEL’S GENDER-NEUTRAL DOLLS CREATE STIR IN THE SERBIAN MEDIA
October 27, 2021
In late 2019, Mattel, a USA toy company, launched “world’s first gender-neutral doll”. Recently, the Creatable World doll became available in Serbia and some of the most influential media in the country reported on it. Some also created a platform to discuss the changes gender inclusive toys will bring to our society.
The Serbian media has a long history of allowing and even promoting hate speech against women and the LGBTQ+ community. However, in the past few years topics such as gender equality gained more coverage than ever before, especially this year when the Serbian government adopted the Law on Gender Equality. For the first time in the Serbian justice system sex is defined as “a biological characteristic on the basis of which people are divided into women and men,” and gender as “socially determined roles, behaviors, activities, and attributes that a particular society deems appropriate for women and men”.
Defining gender as a social construct created a lot of backfire from conservative groups and the national media took the role of a mediator between activists and politicians who were in support of or against the law. In practice, these debates usually involved an activist trying to explain the basics of gender equality and a right-wing politician that usually had statements full of hate speech and insults which journalists often report without critical approach. This picture is quite common in the Serbian media whenever human rights are being discussed. The same thing happened during the Belgrade Pride in September with the Law on Same-Sex Unions, currently being prepared by the Serbian government. It is also happening now with reporting on gender-neutral dolls. The media often fails to educate viewers on the topic they cover and allows hate speech mistakenly depicting it as “freedom of speech”.
During the past week, gender neutral dolls have gained considerable media attention. The gender-neutral doll does not have any specific sex characteristics and basically looks like a child, as opposed to grown-up looking dolls, made to fit societal standards of what a man and a woman should look like. Additionally, each Creatable World doll comes with clothes and wigs that are feminine, masculine and androgynous. With the slogan “a doll line designed to keep labels out and invite everyone in”it seems as the main idea behind the product is to make it inclusive for kids of all genders.
Kids are exposed to gender biases from the time they are born, weather it is through toys, clothes or different sports and activities they are encouraged to engage in. Little girls are given toys such as dolls, kitchen appliances, makeup and motivated to take up dancing or gymnastics classes whereas boys are supposed to like football, play with cars or construction sets. Famous toy manufacturer LEGO recently conducted a research that showed parents and children around the world still have stereotypical thinking on gender roles stating “that girls are typically encouraged into activities that are more cognitive, artistic and related to performance compared to boys who are more likely to be pushed into physical and STEM-like activities”. This research also shows that girls are less supportive of typical gender biases than boys and feel more free to engage in play and activities that are considered to be “meant for boys only”. Keeping in mind how harmful and limiting teaching gender roles to children is for everyone, LEGO committed to remove gender bias from its toys and many toy companies and parents are following.
On Serbian TV Prva this topic was covered in a program called “Same-sex dolls: imposing a trend or accepting diversity”. Even though the overall tone was not negative, throughout the show, the host and some of the guests kept calling the dolls “same-sex” and “sexless”, and neither the host Mira Lekić, nor the psycologist who was invited as expert on the topic made a clear distinction between sex and gender or between sexuality and gender identity. Lack of understanding of the difference between the two is the main trend in digital and print media as well.
It is important to acknowledge that this is one of the rare occasions that gender identity and educating children about it was even talked about in the media. Trans people are usually invisible in the Serbian media, and in rare cases when the media reports on trans stories it is usually through sensational headlines concerning celebrities, often reinforcing stereotypes and using transphobic language. It is seldom that the media reports on stories or problems of trans people in Serbia.
Even though most articles about the new gender-neutral dolls included trans voices and did not encourage transphobia, they were written in a disapproving manner and failed to educate citizens about gender identity and gender equality. The news website Kurir.rs published an article called “CAUTION: GENDER NEUTRAL TOYS CAN BE DANGEROUS TO CHILDREN! Psychologist: The market is forcing us to become HERMAPHRODITES!”. With this headline Kurir.rs is using sensationalism, creating panic based on unbacked claims and using transphobic language. Media reports on this topic are another reminder that education of journalists and media workers on how to report more inclusively is crucial for creating a media space with more diversity. As trans people are often victims of discrimination, violence and very harmful stereotypes, the media plays a very important role in shaping the opinions of their audience. In reporting trans stories ethically the Recommendations To The Media On Reporting On Trans People by organisation GAYTEN can be quite helpful.
Author: Anja Andjušić
Photo: MATTEL website
BEING TRANS IN SERBIA: THE MEDIA’S SILENCE
October 24, 2021
Serbia seems to have built a wall of silence around the trans community. This approach is flawed in many aspects, especially as some from the trans community report it can have detrimental consequences.
“Gender is one aspect of our identity and it is defined as one’s innermost concept of self as a man or a woman. Gender identity is formed in early childhood, about the age of three. One’s gender identity can be the same or different from their sex assigned at birth. People whose gender identity and/or expression is different from cultural expectations based on the sex they were assigned at birth are called transgender or trans.”, (retrieved from transserbia.org.)
When Ana Brnabic was elected she was the first member of Serbia’s LGBTQ+ community to be elected as the country’s Prime Minister. Although Brnabic election was seen as a step forward for the LGBTQ+ community in Serbia, she has done nothing ever since to promote LGBTQ+ rights in the country. This is especially the case for those who identify as transgender. The lives of people whose biological sex differs from their gender identity in countries of the Western Balkans are in some ways much harder than the lives of transgender people in more socially and economically developed countries, or in those countries which are less patriarchal.
In addition to all the difficulties they have as citizens and members of the LGBTQ+ community, trans people are almost invisible in the society and the media; when they are visible they are usually depicted in a negative way
Serbia seems to have built a wall of silence around the trans community. This approach is flawed in many aspects, especially as some from the trans community report it can have detrimental consequences, including suicide and prostitution.
“The biggest problem in understanding the trans community in our country and in neighboring Hungary is the same, and that is a lack of information. People have no idea who trans people are. They know what it means to be a gay, but for trans people, most people think they are ‘some idiots who wear women’s underwear’,” Zoltan Puskas tells Media Diversity Institute.
Zoltan Puskas is a theatre director born in the small town of Senta in northern Serbia where the Hungarian national minority is located . He describes himself as a double minority; his national and gender identities afforded him minority status. At the age of six he discovered that he was different from other boys. His parents let him dress like a woman, but he never talked to them about his gender identity or sexuality. When he was in school, everybody used to say that ‘it’ was sick, so he was scared and hid his identity. People around him used to say that the traditional way of living should be followed. When he was eleven, he walked in a dress around Senta for the first time. He felt as if he was flying. Today, when he goes to the local market in his hometown dressed as a man, everyone asks him what’s wrong with him. He jokes that it is not easy to be a woman.,
“Those who think that being trans or gay is in fashion these days are also wrong. That is not true. It’s not a choice, that’s how you are born. A transgender person is someone who was born in the wrong body: you were born a man, but everything else is like a woman, your brain works like a woman’s brain, you have a woman’s soul, when it comes to men – you are annoyed by the same things that annoy all other women, and only when hormones overwhelm you,” Puskas continues.

Invisibility is the hardest
“It takes time to understand who you are and accept yourself as such, because nobody talks about it in public. When I was a child you could not even read or hear anything about it, you have no idea what’s going on with you, you think you’re going crazy. This is how your uphill struggle begins and it lasts as long as you live, your life-and-death struggle, because you will never be accepted no matter how you choose to live. There is no normal life for you.
The wall of silence surrounds you – you are ignored by the society, by the media. What is more, when you go to see a doctor because of a common illness, he or she is puzzled and doesn’t know what to do with you. He looks at you frantically and suspiciously. There are constant reminders that you are worth less than other people. Therefore, if you are not strong enough, you sink into depression again and again. Because of that, a lot of trans people end up committing suicide, or they move to the escort zone. These issues are not addressed in patriarchal societies and in countries with social, economic and political problems.” said Puskas.
The way Serbian media treat transgender people is less than ideal. According to Puskas the majority of the population are not aware of the what it means to be a trans person, and that includes journalists as well.
When asked what he thinks how Serbian media understands and portrays transgender people and what issues the media should cover, Puskas says:
“If journalists know nothing about trans people, how can they inform the public?” he says.
In addition Puskas stresses the fact that people simply do not care and even though he partly understands the reasons why it still baffles him as they all live in the same space.
“Of course, I am aware that sexual minorities will never be accepted in this country. Trans people have even experienced rejection and ignorance by the gay community, so, how can I expect someone who does not understand what a trans person is to accept a trans person? A few years ago, the organizer of Belgrade’s Pride Parade did not want to walk side by side with trans people. The gay population does not accept us! So, where are we? The Dark Ages?!” Puskas emphasises.
The director points out that the media in Serbia, and in neighboring Hungary, report on trans people only during the Pride Parade or when trans people are involved in an incident. This exclusionary way of reporting could lead to stereotyping trans people as troublemakers.
Serbian media seem to be interested in ‘trans’ stories that can collect a lot of clicks: stories in which a politician, a sportsman, a public figure is trans, gay or bisexual.. Zoltan Puskas, however, has to deal with two different issues due to his identities: being transgender as well as part of the Hungarian minority. This means that he is concerned both about issues to a personal level.
“I don’t know what is worse: the silence about our existence or the situation in Hungary. A few months ago Orban’s regime in Hungary’s parliament voted to end legal recognition for trans people and they even banned talking about anything connected with ‘sexual minority’ in schools. So we practically don’t exist there. I do not suggest that children should be taught transsexuality or transgenderism, but I think that the society cannot be silent about our presence,” Puskas tells Media Diversity Institute.
In his attempts to bring the life of transgender people closer to the public, theatre director Zoltan Puskas has often dealt with this topic in his work. He has directed two plays with transgender people. Last year he directed Chekhov’s ‘Three Sisters’ in which the three sisters were three transgender individuals who spoke about Orban’s repressive laws in neighbouring Hungary. Apart from dealing with Hungary’s repressive laws the play also dealt with topics of sexuality.
The director says that he wanted to talk about the things the media ignore even though they should not. He wanted to show people what the lives of trans people look like, how trans people think and feel, what problems they have, what they look like when they are unhappy, that they suffer and cry when their love is unrequited or when they are left by their loved ones. Puskas wanted to show that transgender people are just like anyone else.
“I have never had positive or negative media coverage because of my sexuality. It has always been about my work, which is good. I have had negative experiences because I am a trans person in other life situations. That’s why I spend a fortune on taxis in order to avoid unpleasant situations while I walk around the city, because people look at me like I’m a miracle – everybody, men and women, the young, the old, although I never provoke, but you can see my sexuality from the helicopter. On the other hand, wherever I work I am well accepted by the colleagues, in theatres in Serbia, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia. I get the respect and love that I do not have in everyday life from them, as well as from my male and female friends,” Puskas tells Media Diversity Institute.
Puskas believes that artists, media and journalists who deal with culture, and even part of the public, accept and understand him better through his art, and it is, according to the director, a matter of talent and ideas, not sexuality. At the same time, Puskas says that his works are differently shaped because he has both a male and female part in himself, that it is something that differs him from those who are only ’men’ or ‘women’. Sometimes, the duality he has in himself is not good for him personally: “But what can I do about it, I am married to myself? You accept it, or you divorce it! ” stresses the director.
Despite the fact the LGBTQ+ community is increasingly thematized in all arts, from film and theatre to dance, fine and visual arts, the trans identity is still a taboo in Serbia. It is not even mentioned for much-needed educational purposes:
“You can’t find it in the media, or only very, very rarely, you can come across a story about people who change their sex. You can’t read what it all means, what kind of process it is, how difficult and dangerous the journey can be. It is not just an operation, but also taking hormones that change the personality, lead to depression, destabilize the personality. You have to go to a psychologist all the time. Most people have no idea what awaits them, because it’s not just – today you are a man, and tomorrow you are a woman, and that’s it. Therapy is never over: you drink hormones till the end of your life. The media should write about it. ” emphasizes Puskas, adding:
“Also, the media should write about the difficulties transgender people have when seeking job. If they are out as transgender at the first job interview, they usually aren’t invited to the second round. They experience various insulting situations, they are made fun of and ridiculed. I know that this is not only a problem of Serbia, but all over the world as well, but in Serbia a trans person can only be an escort, meaning a sexual object in the context of married people. The married, the single, sportsmen, politicians, young and slightly older men, they all flirt with trans people, but only in secret,”says Zoltan Puskas.
Closer to a dignified life
“Senta is the only place where I feel protected, and, although I would say for myself that I am a very brave person, I don’t think I am brave enough to change my gender by surgery. One of the reasons is the fact that in that case, the zone of my work would change, it would be narrowed and shortened. I couldn’t stand it. I love theater, it’s my life, it is my comfort zone. However, with or without the surgery, it is increasingly difficult for me to find the strength for the courage to be my own on a daily basis. However, it is getting more and more difficult for me to find the strength for the courage to be myself on a daily basis, with or without the surgery. Every day you get up and carry your cross. Besides, like any other person, I want a relationship, I want love, I want understanding and mutual respect, but as long as Trans people are kept invisible it is almost impossible to have these things. ” says Puskas, who does not believe that in this environment he will live long enough to see a time when a trans person could have a normal life, life worthy of a human being.
Given the circumstances, it would be normal to expect that Puskas is connected with trans community, but he is an exception:
“I am not connected with any trans community, primarily because 98 percent of trans people in our country are in the escort zone, and I cannot accept that. If you do something for money, it’s business. It is not love. That’s why I’ve been hanging out with heterosexual women for 30 years, my female friends who understand me well, and I understand them. There is no mistake here,” Puskas points out.
The arts and specifically theatre gave Puskas the sanctuary that he needed in order to find himself. Through his work he is able to show the difficulties that the trans community faces in a country that they are visible and in his way he manages to put them in the forefront of society. Although the media in Serbia have failed in every way in their reporting of transgender stories, the arts are providing a safe space and a start to a more visible life.
Note: Zoltan Puskas identifies as transgender and uses both male and female pronouns depending on social situations.
Autor: Snežana MIletić
This article was first published on Media Diversity Institute website.
Photo: nito / Shutterstock
CHILDREN IN TELEVISION PROGRAMS: in between bullying and use for marketing purposes
October 15, 2021
In the programme “T’ka mami yll” (“You’re mom’s star”) a “reality show” dance program for children aged 10-15 years, broadcast on ABC News television, the inappropriate treatment of a child has been identified due to her body weight.
Jury members consistently link the presence of the 8-year-old girl in the program to her excess weight.
Some of the questions addressed to the child are: “Why did you come here?”; “Are you sure [you came to dance]?”; “What do you like better, eating or dancing?”; “Would you give up food to dance?”
Further still, jury members create situations where the child is asked to eat sweets in public, or where they toy with her with eating chips. Her existence in the program is solely reduced to food and eating.
The public has reacted to this treatment of the child by condemning the adults’ behavior, their bullying and psychological violence against her, due to her weight, or nutritional problems.
After the public’s reaction, two members of the jury reacted by explaining that “they had no denigrating or bullying intentions towards the child,” with whose parents they had a close friendship.
“Liana is the daughter of a friend of mine. She has been present at the academy for 6 months, not at all with the aspiration to become a ballerina, but handed over to me by her father for health reasons. This means that the child has nothing to do with ballet, but only to exercise physically, to give up food, because this generation does not eat healthily.”
The actions that adults perform in the program are contradictory to what they express verbally. Giving sweets, canned juices and chips are not equivalent to healthy eating. In addition to being the object of bullying in their eyes, the child is also used for marketing purposes, which affect her psychological, physical, emotional and social well-being.
Treating the child in such a way becomes a trigger and incites social bullying, lowers self-esteem, promotes anxiety, as well as negatively affects the child’s performance in many other areas.
According to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, ratified by Albania, the child must be guaranteed protection from any action that affects his social, spiritual and moral well-being, as well as his physical and mental health. Children in the media enjoy special protection, according to Albanian legislation and the “Code of Ethics of Albanian Media.” Under no circumstances should one “benefit” from children, nor should they be asked questions about “personal matters” in the absence or without the consent of their parents.
The State Agency for the Rights and Protection of the Child is one of the public institutions that must ensure the guaranteeing of this protection, together with the Audiovisual Media Authority (AMA).
AMA has already made a request to ABC News television to stop practices where the moral and legal requirements for the protection of children’s rights have not been respected, in accordance with law 97/2013, article 4, point 1/c, as well as articles 5.38 and 5.41 of the Broadcasting Code, which specify the special treatment and care that children should enjoy in audiovisual broadcasting.
Reporting Diversity Network 2.0 condemns any behavior or action that promotes bullying and the abuse of children in the media. At the same time, it calls for proactive actions undertaken by accountable institutions in order to improve the situation of child treatment in the media, so that such incidents do not recur.
Autors: Dorentina Hysa and Kristina Lani, Albanian Media Institute
Photo: “T’ka mami yll”, Dance Reality Show, 09 October 2021 (YouTube screenshot)
REPORTING DIVERSITY Training of Trainers – Call for Participants
October 12, 2021
WHEN: 11-13 November 2021
WHERE: Belgrade, Serbia
Reporting Diversity Network 2.0 is inviting CSOs; grass-root activists; human rights defenders; journalists; editors; to attend the Reporting Diversity training of trainers. The training will take place in Belgrade, between 11-13 November and will gather 30 participants from across the Western Balkans.
The organisers will ensure all necessary epidemiological measures are followed.
The participants will gain skills that will help them be more inclusive of minorities’ points of views; recognise hate speech and divisive narratives, its manifestations and be able to counter them. The three-day workshop will focus on three set of skills: campaigning, advocacy, and legal action.
The Reporting Diversity Network 2.0 aims to introduce and establish new practices of counteracting divisive media messages by providing alternative responses, demanding reaction (by the media, civil society, and/or authorities) and publicly exposing perpetrators.
This workshop is designed to equip participants with capacities, channels, resources, and methods to engage more effectively and actively and make countering irresponsible and often illegal behaviour of actors in media sphere part of their regular practice in upholding human rights, rule of law and democracy standards in the region. This entails better-informed and substantiated CSO advocacy actions aimed at achieving policy influence, but also at alternating public perceptions of irresponsible media behaviour through effective campaigns. For these reasons exactly, the Reporting Diversity ToT will focus on increasing participant’s traditional and social media campaigning skills as well as advocacy skills.
All travel and accommodation costs will be covered by organisers. In case you have some specific requests related to travel and/or accommodation please let us know in advance in the comments section.
Please note that, in order to secure safe environment, each participant will be required to have proof of vaccination or a negative PCR test no older than 48 hours.
To apply, please fill in this form before October 24. Selected participants will be notified by October 29.
Reporting Diversity Network 2.0 is established by the Media Diversity Institute, Center for Investigative Journalism Montenegro, Center for Investigative Journalism Bosnia and Herzegovina, South East European Network for Profesionalization of Media, Albanian Media Institute, Institute for Communication Studies, Media Diversity Institute Western Balkans and Kosovo 2.0.
The network is established as part of the 4-year project funded by the European Union. Balkan Trust for Democracy, a project by the German Marshall Fund of the United States, and the Royal Norwegian Embassy in Belgrade.
BATTLE OVER HEADLINES: The Kosovar and Serbian media are on different planets
October 8, 2021
Another “war” between Kosovo and Serbia has ended. This one was over license plates and brought the north of Kosovo back into the spotlight beyond Prishtina and Belgrade. The scenario of this “war” was similar to others in the north. Kosovo used its most serious police force, the Kosovo Police Special Unit, while Kosovo Serbs again erected barricades in the north, in opposition to the government’s decision to enforce reciprocity on license plates.
Eventually, after almost two weeks of tensions, both sides saw the need to reduce tensions, and they reached an agreement in Brussels that was more or less similar to one signed in 2016. Of course, both governments present the final result as a victory for their own side.
With the end of this “war,” the media war between publications in Kosovo and Serbia also came to a cease fire. The uneven way the media reports on the conflict between Kosovo and Serbia, as in the case of the license plates, is a tradition of the dialogue that has lasted over ten years. Most media in Serbia follow the official state policy, and those in Kosovo largely conform to public opinion. Conflicting public statements about the agreements and the lack of transparency in the dialogue leads to a conducive atmosphere for tensions.
Since the beginning, the dialogue has been derailed by the deliberate misinterpretation of the agreements reached between both sides. Both parties to the dialogue use these interpretations to present certain agreements as historic victories and to hide aspects of agreements at moments when they must compromise.
WHEN THE MEDIA ONLY WORKS TO SERVE THOSE IN POWER, OR TO AGREE WITH THE MAJORITY PUBLIC OPINION, THE FLAMES OF TENSION WILL ONLY BE FANNED.
The media in such cases follows the official line of the state, presenting events how the state sees them rather than how they are in reality. The other side is always to blame. When the media only works to serve those in power, or to agree with the majority public opinion, the flames of tension will only be fanned.
Subtle bits of misinformation guide readers on how they’re supposed to feel. For example, the headlines of most media in Belgrade on September 20 were about ROSU’s seizure of the Brnjak and Jarinje border posts, despite the fact that the ROSU unit of the Kosovo Police has not existed for years. But for most of the press in Belgrade this does not matter. ROSU is conveniently linked to previous conflicts in northern Kosovo and helps the media call back on those events.
Few people in Serbia believe that the epilogue of such conflicts could be war. Many others think that incidents are created for political needs. In fact, the two-to-three day conflicts between Kosovo and Serbia used to be called “weekend wars,” although this time it lasted almost two weeks.
“It seems to us that it was the first time that we came a millimeter away from another armed conflict and, I say without modesty, this was prevented thanks to Aleksandar Vučić. And well done for that, hats off to him,” said Prime Minister Ana Brnabić a few days after the interim agreement in Brussel was reached.
What Prime Minister Brnabić is right about is the fact that Serbia had several times put its army on alert, or at least a part of the army. But since 1999 it had not put these tanks out on the streets, or flown their jets and helicopters in the border area. Serbia can not fly over Kosovo airspace as it is under NATO protection.
Tensions rose on the ground alongside the rising tensions in the media. “HELLISH PLAN REVEALED: Kurti wants a war to create Greater Albania,” was just one of the headlines in the Belgrade tabloids.
Serbia mobilized the entire pro-government media apparatus to react harshly to the Kosovo government’s decision to impose reciprocal measures on license plates. As in previous cases when the National Security Council of Serbia has met, President Vučić again gave the speech he always gives, saying he will not allow “the humiliation of Serbia or unilateral decisions.”
WHILE THE ALBANIAN MEDIA DIDN’T DIRECTLY PROVOKE THE SITUATION, THEY MORE THAN DID THEIR PART IN BROADCASTING THE PROVOCATIONS OF OTHERS.
There was some uncertainty as the tensions rose. Serbian-language media reported that three Serb citizens were beaten and Belgrade hastily accused Kosovo police. Kosovo Police denied that such an event took place. Serbian media then covered the story from the hospital where they interviewed men who gave accounts of being beaten by the police. Petar Petković, head of the office for Kosovo, cast blame on Prime Minister Kurti.
“Albin Kurti is directly to blame for this. Now it is more than clear that he is not interested in dialogue or the resolution of the crisis, but only in trying to occupy the north of Kosovo and Metohija by force,” said Petković.
Serbian media also questioned whether the Kosovo Security Force, Kosovo’s army, had infiltrated the ranks of the police operating in the north.
While the Albanian media didn’t directly provoke the situation, they more than did their part in broadcasting the provocations of others. In addition, the lack of access to the Serb community meant that there was no insightful treatment of the situation.
One of the events that was reported in Kosovo, but hardly at all in Serbia, was the news about the presence of four Russians, supposed infiltrators among the Serbs who were passing themselves off as protesters.
“The Russians brought with them three bags, which they opened only when it was dark,” as one article cryptically put it. The article noted that the Russians’ arrival caused concern among local Serbs, but specified some lines later that the “Serbs had come from Montenegro.”
Prime Minister Kurti was also eager to point out the presence of non-Kosovo Serbs at the barricades. He posted images and biographical details of two men on his Facebook page, describing them as Montenegrin and Serbian extremists with criminal backgrounds and links to the Serbian government. The Serbian media did not report on this.
Crossing the border
Free movement has been a topic of discussion since the beginning of the technical dialogue and the basis of the first Brussels agreement, which included the initial license plate agreement. But even after reaching the agreement ten years ago it was unclear what was actually agreed upon.
At first, Kosovo license plates were not allowed to enter Serbia at all, despite the fact that they did not include the acronym of the republic and were still only “KS.” At one point, drivers with Kosovo plates entering Serbia had to pay around 30 euros for a three-day provisional license and over 100 euros for a month-long license. Later cars with “KS” license plates were allowed entry into Serbia free of charge, but not “RKS” plates.
Soon Serbia was accepting Kosovo identity cards, but no one could explain what the agreement had to say about Kosovo passports. This may not have been a problem for people traveling back and forth between Kosovo and Serbia, but for holders of Kosovo documents traveling by plane through Belgrade, it was a major issue.
THE AMBIGUITY OF AGREEMENTS REACHED IN BRUSSELS IS REINFORCED BY A LACK IN THE MEDIA SPACE.
Serbia now allows travelers with Kosovo ID cards to fly out of the Belgrade airport if they have a valid visa and a temporary document issued by the Serbian police. So two documents and a letter are needed. This has left many travelers confused. Sometimes even the Serbian police do not know the details of the agreement and will say something like, “with these documents you can only travel by land, but not by air.”
The ambiguity of these agreements is reinforced by a lack in the media space. Most Albanian-language media do not have correspondents in Belgrade or Brussels, and few Serbian journalists working in Kosovo speak any Albanian and when reporting tend to show Kosovo exclusively through the official lens of the state. All this does not leave much room for balanced information on such a sensitive issue as the relations between Kosovo and Serbia.
The phenomenon of Kosovar and Serbian media reporting entirely different things has been a part of the dialogue from the beginning. The lack of information about the agreements leaves citizens to figure out the details on their own, without proper guidance. Above all, it hinders the normalization of relations between the two peoples.
This article was originally produced for and published by Kosovo 2.0 within the framework of RDN 2.0 project. It has been re-published here with permission.
Feature image: Atdhe Mulla / K2.0.
HATE SPEECH IN THE WESTERN BALKANS: September Monthly Highlights
October 7, 2021
Throughout the month of September, the RDN monitoring team has detected a range of hateful narratives and discourse. During this month there has been a rise in hate speech including ethnic discrimination and xenophobia towards various ethnic communities as well as instances of homophobia and anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric across all six Western Balkan states.
Ethnic discrimination in the Western Balkan
For the past five years, the Agreement of Freedom of Movement created between Kosovo and Serbia, demanded that vehicles with licence plates of “KS” could enter Serbia from Kosovo, however, licence plates “RKS” had to be replaced with temporary plates at the border. Cars with Serbian licence plates on the other hand, could enter Kosovo without any problems. Nevertheless, recently, after the Agreement expired on 15 September, the Government of Kosovo decided to introduce reciprocal measures which made crossing borders between both countries more complicated. Most notably, cars with Serbian licence plates would be required to take temporary licence plates when entering Kosovo too.
Following these recent political tensions between both Serbia and Kosovo, there has been a rise in ethnic discrimination and hate speech on both sides. Kosovo Online recently published a post with the title “Drama at Brljak: Special forces tried to get a Serb out of the car, KFOR prevented the incident”. KFOR is a NATO-led international peacekeeping force in Kosovo. According to the post, the “police demanded that a citizen of Serbian nationality get out of the car and remove the KM license plate, which he refused, so they started to pull him out of the car. Who knows how everything would have ended if KFOR members had not come along and calmed down the whole situation, Serbs who were protesting gathered there, and the driver managed to get to safety”. This was not confirmed by Kosovo police, KFOR, on any relevant authority in Kosovo.
As a reaction and protest to the recent reciprocal measures undertaken by the Kurti government in Kosovo, Kosovo Serbs have been blocking two border crossings in northern Kosovo for the past three days. Within the previously mentioned article, Kosovo Online has been sharing and spreading fake news which can only lead to negative consequences. Given the historical and prior interethnic relations between Albanians and Serbs in Kosovo, the spread of harmful disinformation and inaccurate news leads to misinforming the public of actual events taking place thereby creating insecurity and fear.
At the other side of the border, Serbia’s newspaper Informer published an article on their website titled “Shiptars in a panic! America informed them that Vucic is not bluffing- the Serbian army will, in case of an attack, protect the people in Kosovo!”. The article claimed that “Albin Kurti and his extremists do not know what to do! The day after the Croatian and German NATO instructors at the ‘Vrelo’ base near Vučitrna trained them how to break the Serbian blockades ‘in an hour’ and take full control over the north of Kosovo, the Shiptars received a serious warning from the USA”.
The media, especially tabloids have been feeding sensationalist reports on the Belgrade-Pristina happenings, which contribute to raising ethnic tension and division between Albanians and Serbs that can have negative consequences. In addition to using derogatory names when reporting on Albanians, Informer continues to contribute to the spread of disinformation and fear when reporting on the situation at hand. By publishing such sensationalist headlines, the rise in tension and fear amongst the public creates false impressions of conflict which can further spark violence and hatred on both sides. By using such derogatory names and terminology when reporting on Albanians, this runs the risk of fostering hatred especially as Informer has such a large readership and reach.
In Albania, ethnic tension and fear of conflict continues as JOQ Albania, recently posted an image depicting three women in army uniform with the title “Would you join the Kosovo Security Force against Serbia if war erupts in the north of Kosovo?”. This was followed with a ‘poll’ on JOQ Albania’s Instagram page in relation to the growing tensions in the region and fear of conflict. The comments underneath the post were overwhelmingly in support of joining Kosovo against Serbia if war were to erupt, with many comments calling for “joining our brothers”.
The post – which received over 32,000 likes and over 2,000 comments – contributes to the rise of ethnic tensions in the region and spreads misinformation and feeds the public’s fear of the possibility of war and conflict. This also creates a further wedge and divide between the two ethnic communities on the basis of misleading narratives.
Homophobia and anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric
At the Demographic Summit in Hungary, Milorad Dodik, Bosnia and Herzegovina’s member of the presidency and president of the Alliance of Independent Social Democrats (SNSD) spread strong anti-LGBTQ rhetoric and homophobic remarks.
During his speech, he made specific references to the traditional role of mother and father within family settings and posed strong opposition and disapproval for same sex couples and families. He said “they want to impose their values on me and I run away from that. Don’t touch me you sick person. Get away from me, do what you want but don’t touch me. And now I am incorrect, but they are correct. There is parent 1 and parent 2. I have not yet said that parent number 1 and number 2 gave birth to a child”.
He furthermore, expressed his frustration towards his right to voice his opinion but arguing that “how is it possible that I cannot speak and that it is politically incorrect to say that the mother is a woman and the father a man. Sorry, I can’t learn that. It doesn’t make logical sense in my head”.
Using such insulting and misleading language when referring to the LGBTQ+ community, can marginalise groups which are already excluded and face unequal treatment within society. Such homophobic comments by someone such as Dodik, who has a large political and public platform, spread anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric and hate speech and continue to justify and maintain homophobia in society. Such narratives could lead to acts of hatred and violence. Politicians, who are supposed to represent society and their interests, should be held accountable and responsible for spreading this form of hate speech.
In Montenegro, Vijesti.me published an article in relation to a recent incident of homophobic speech from a member of the Democratic Party of Socialists of Montenegro (DPS). In that article there was a video which included a highly derogative and homophobic word to describe Dritan Abazović , leader of the United Reform Action (URA) and Aleksa Bečić, the President of Democratic Montenegro. Furthermore, when asked to apologise for using such terminology, the DPS party accused the URA movement of downloading footage from private Viber groups thereby, justifying such inflammatory speech as ‘private footage’. The URA search committee argued that they do not expect “sanctions for this member of the DPS from its main parts, because that is what is characteristic of their political activities”.
Such statements excuse and downplay the use of homophobic hate speech by justifying its use and thereby allowing such terminology to be upheld and accepted within society especially from political parties and individuals.
Hate speech in North Macedonia
Petrit Saracini is a well-known, outspoken civil activist and a former employee of the Government who now works for the CSO ‘Civil Media’ where he regularly comments on various political happenings. Recently, on one of his posts on Facebook, a member of the political party ‘Levica’ published a video comment in which he insinuated that Petrit has ‘little time left’ and even though the exact intentions were not clear, it leaves the doubt whether or not the comments are indeed a threat to the life of Saracini. In his video he said “Petrit you black hold, where are you heading you rat, little bit more, do you know that you won’t have a hole to hide in. Let it out, just a little bit more”.
It is possible that the comment could be interpreted as referring to the period after the local elections which are scheduled for October in which ‘Levica’ expect to receive a high number of votes and gain more political power and influence. The post itself received around 888 views at the time of writing and runs the risk of inciting false information and hate speech towards Sarancini which could further promote and spark violence.
TROLL OF THE MONTH: TV PINK
October 4, 2021
The Balkan Troll of the Month is an individual, a group of individuals or a media outlet that spreads hate on the internet based on gender, ethnicity, religion, or other diversity categories. The Balkan Troll is selected based on hate speech incidents identified across the Western Balkans region.
Our September Troll of the Month is TV Pink who spread sexist and misogynistic narratives towards women and victims of rape as well as ethnic discrimination and xenophobia.
TV Pink is a privately owned national TV station in Serbia and one of the leading commercial stations in the country. During the morning show ‘Novo Jutro’ on TV Pink, former Serbian football player and coach, Dušan Savić was invited as part of the programme and shared his opinions regarding the case against Miroslav Aleksić – director actor and acting teacher- who was recently released from prison following various rape allegations. Savić, a good friend of Aleksić, defended his friend by spreading harmful sexist narratives and victim blaming.
Last January, the Belgrade Higher Court ordered a ‘30-day custody remand for Miroslav ‘Mika’ Aleksic, who was accused of raping several female pupils, at least one of whom was a minor at the time’. Aleksić’s acting school was extremely popular in Serbia where ‘according to some local media around 3,000 people attended his classes over four decades’. Many of today’s famous actors and actresses as well as TV presenters attended his acting school.
Indeed, the MeToo Movement has helped start discussions towards the safety of women and violence against them including rape and sexual assault.According to Vanja Mecanović, a member of the NGO Autonomous Women’s Centre, the MeToo Movement has had a “positive trend of supporting the victims who were afraid to report the violence for a long period of time”. Within Serbia, the hashtag #NisiSama (you are not alone) started following the decision of actresses Milena Radulović, Iva Ilinčić and five other women, who attended Aleksic’s acting school to come forward and report instances of sexual harassment, rape and violence by Miroslav Aleksić. This further encouraged others to come forward and tell their story. As a result, the Facebook group ‘Nisam trazila’ (I didn’t ask for it) was created to support women from the whole region, supporting one another through the hashtag #NisiSama.
When talking about the various actresses who came forward to accuse and expose Aleksić for both rape and sexual assault, Savić commented that “it’s not only about Mika Aleksić, it’s a much deeper story and more dangerous”. He also said to the TV host Jovana Jeremić that
the “attack on Mika Aleksić and that affair was constructed and made for almost a year and a half and financed from various sides, designed not only in our country but also in others and Lečić, Palma and Petnica case were later added to the story, and even your colleague started calling out Bata Miladinović, who died twenty years ago”. Following these serious rape denial accusations, the host of the morning show made a comment to add that “people do all sorts of things for 5 minutes of fame”. Such a comment made by the host of a morning show which has national frequency, is extremely unprofessional and runs the risk of presenting a national TV channel supportive of Dusan Savič’s assumptions and allegations of the ‘false’ stories of rape.
Savić linked the recent rape allegations as a mechanism for attacking the Serbian nation thereby, suggesting that rape allegations are a tool for attacking the country itself rather than actual accounts of violence towards women.
Savić went as far as to claim that all these stories were indeed ‘made up’, arguing that this “made-up affair” started “when there was a lot of lobbying around the world for the propaganda Muslim movie (Quo vadis, Aida)” – a movie set during the Srebrenica genocide.
These narratives are extremely dangerous and xenophobic. By making comments that include ethnic discrimination and genocide denial, Savić spreads and upholds anti-Bosnian rhetoric which are both dangerous and harmful towards the victims of genocide and those who suffered the wars in Yugoslavia by creating false narratives of denial.
Not only are such sexist and misogynistic narratives harmful but by promoting such hate speech openly on a national TV Channel, these ideas and false premises are spread and upheld within the population.
TV Pink, has both a moral obligation and a duty to stand up to hateful, misleading narratives such as those promoted by Dusan Savić – as this event took place on their morning show, the television station is responsible for the content which is shared and aired on their programme. Allowing such comments on a TV channel with national frequency, further promotes sexism and misogyny within the community whilst also allowing both rape and genocide denial to be said openly with no consequence. TV Pink has a duty to monitor the content of their shows and ensure that such harmful, unfounded, narratives are both exposed and counteracted to prevent them being accepted and maintained within society.
It is, furthermore, the duty of regulatory bodies such as the Regulatory Body for Electronic Media (REM) within Serbia to react to such harmful narratives to prevent them from being said on national TV platforms with no repercussions of any sort.
Recently, Media Diversity Institute Western Balkans made a public statement to various media organisations in response to unethical reporting and secondary victimisation following the incident on TV Pink in which it was made clear that the broadcaster violated several rules and regulations in place for the protection of human rights in the field of media services. The most notable was Article 26 which explicitly states that when informing about violence or tragic event, the media service provider is obliged to do that in a way that will not violate the human dignity of the victim of violence or tragic event nor a person close to them, and especially in a way that they are not exposed to repeated suffering.
Therefore, the media has an obligation and responsibility to ensure that when reporting on sexual violence they are aware and conscious of the sensitivity of the topic itself and nature of that trauma so as to provide a safe platform for victims of sexual violence to come forward and not promote narratives of denial which leads to further silencing.
Read the article in Sebian.
MONTENEGRO ETHNIC DIVISIONS MIRRORED IN DIVISIVE MEDIA DISCOURSES
September 24, 2021
Hearing my two Montenegrin colleagues recently describe what they felt on September 5th – one describing mostly peaceful protest with cooperative police in Cetinje and the other one a terrifying panic over her impression that there is a violent chaos taking place as following the media and social networks from home – to me sounded like a perfect experiment of how media can shape the perception. But this was not the only example where one could see opposing versions of what happened around the enthronement of the Serbian Orthodox Church’s Joanikije II in the Montenegrin town of Cetinje monastery. Depending from where you tuned in, followed from or whether you participated in the Cetinje events earlier this month, it could seem as different events and places.
Days before the disputed enthronement and still continued, the media sphere was filled with different versions of what was to happen – one could gather both that Serbian extremists are taking over Montenegro and that the Montenegrin nationalists were trying a coup d’état. Accusations of extremism flew around on all sides as well as qualifications such as “hordes”, “terrorists”, “betrayal”, “fascization”, “occupation”. How to make sense of it?
The enthronement
People from several cities in Montenegro gathered in Cetinje to protest against the enthronement of the Metropolitan of Montenegro and the Littoral of the Serbian Orthodox Church seeing it as a way of still claiming Montenegro as part of Serbia, from which it separated in 2006. Protesters stood against denial of Montenegrin national identity and against claim of the country’s historical capital as place of enthronement for the Serbian Orthodox Church.
By blocking the roads that lead to the town, the protesters did not allow the Serbian patriarch and clergy from coming to the Cetinje monastery. Police used teargas to push back hundreds of protesters some of whom threw rocks at them and set tires on fire. Persistent for the enthronement to take place, backed by the Montenegrin government, the clergy arrived to the monastery by military helicopter. Under the protection of bodyguards and sniper blanket, the priests held the ceremony for Joanikije. Dozens were injured and arrested, including an advisor to the president and former police director.
While the current prime minister Zdravko Krivokapic helped and welcomed the event, the country’s president and virtual ruler of Montenegro of three decades Milo Djukanovic saw it as a way of still present or a renewed influence of Serbia and Russia. More and more visible in the recent years, the two ethnic blocs, Serbian and Montenegrin, set out to be the basis of deep divisions in the country of about 600,000 people, about three quarters of whom are Orthodox Christians. After years of Djukanovic’s party dominance, from last year the ruling coalition in Montenegro is headed by Krivokapic and the government seen as leaning towards Serbia. Meanwhile, the disputed Freedom of Religion Law raised questions over the ownership of properties of religious communities, as the initial law foresaw that the state of Montenegro would be registered as owner of any real estate or facility that did not have proof of ownership from before 1918 when this country was part of Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes.
In the media
Despite the teargas, stone throwing and political and ethnic tensions, the protests of citizens holding Montenegrin flags sent a message of pride in their identity and struggle of political independence from Serbia. Meanwhile, the declared Serbs in Montenegro (about a third of population), their political representatives and the Serbian Orthodox Church made their mark with the enthronement of Joanikije. What remains is the divided Montenegrin society that many deem as shadowed by similar dark spirits as those from the ‘9o-ties that troubled the region. And similarly, the media seem to be politically instrumentalised for warmongering by not reflecting the reality but significantly influencing it.
In ethnically and religiously divided societies, the media often stand servile to divided audiences and opposing political options, usually fuelling opposing narratives. In such circumstances, as visible in Montenegro as well, the majority of media are not the ones to break the divisive cycles but they rather keep them running. And what the audiences do is find the media outlets, as well as individual voices on social media, that best reflect their already existing views, keeping them away from stepping out from their zones of comfort and far from observing what surrounds them with a critical eye, especially in burning moments like early September saw in Cetinje.
The mainstream media in Montenegro, and those inevitably influential ones from Serbia, have one thing in common – fuelling tensions by offering conflicting versions of what is happening and what it all means for the country.
“Cancellation was not an option at any point as some media outlets reported. The state was defended!” wrote prime minister Krivokapic in a tweet following calls and reports about the enthronement of Joanikije not to be held in Cetinje. This was republished as a victorious statement in the pro-Serb media and with criticism in the Montenegrin media which emphasized the unwelcomeness of the event in the old capital. Criticized for putting lives of citizens at risk and actually working against the state of Montenegro, Krivokapic is being accused for working in the interests of Serbia and betraying ethnic Montenegrins.
Sharing his belief prior to September 5 that the enthronement will not take place in Cetine, the president Djukanovic said that Podgorica should be the place for the ceremony. “They cannot do this by force, by endangering freedom of expression and the rights of citizens of the capital. That is not a good approach. Even if someone would succeed in this, he would always have to feel as if he forcefully created his wish here, as someone who violated the capital and its citizens,” he added.
From what could be seen from outside of Montenegro, the mainstream media covered the events and presented the main messages – who said what. It seemed like everyone did their usual job. On a nothing but a usual day, and moment in time.
Hundred kilometres away, driving towards Croatia, my colleague and I stubbornly searched for an internet streaming of a live open programme of a local television or a radio station. Except of short and dry news updates from the Montenegrin state radio, not much remained than to stick to online media and social networks. And there, depending on where you stand politically, you could read about extremists on all sides, hooligans and occupiers, rights to freedom and violation of freedom of the others, patriots and intruders, and the list of adverbs can go on and on.
Despite the efforts of dozens of hard-working reporters who spent days and nights in the field, capturing what they saw and heard, what results when their materials are put through the grinding machines of newsroom editorials, mainstream media and social networks, does not turn out always right. Consequently, the opposing realities presented in the media are dangerous in the region where long-time historical disputes re-emerge every now and then and suck in new generations in repeated tensions. Divided media create parallel realities for different people and it is now not clear if there is a way for the citizens of Montenegro to overcome the divisions served by politicians through the media.
For my Montenegrin colleague who followed the media and social networks from home kilometres away from Cetinje, fear that the culmination of the events will end up in a blood shell is understandable. Luckily, she knows better than to stick only to that experience, but she might not belong to the majority.
Author: Elvira Jukic-Mujkic
Photo: Nikiforov Alexander / Shutterstock
REM DA REAGUJE NA NEETIČKO IZVEŠTAVANJE I SEKUNDARNU VIKTIMIZACIJU
September 17, 2021
Beograd, 17.9.2021
Nakon što je Miroslav Aleksić, koji je osumnjičen za silovanje i nedozvoljene polne radnje, pušten u kućni pritvor, nekadašnji fudbaler Dušan Savić gostovao je na televiziji Pink. Savić je u jutarnjem programu govorio kako je optužnica „iskonstruisana”, „osmišljena” i kako predstavlja napad na Srbiju. U emisiji su korišćeni razni argumenti kako bi se pokazalo da prijavljivanje silovanja i seksualnog uznemiravanja ima za cilj „rušenje Srbije”.
Narativi koje je koristio Dušan Savić su nedopustivi jer mogu da doprinosu društvenoj osudi i sekundarnoj viktimizaciji žrtava seksualnog nasilja i time obeshrabruju one koji su preživeli seksualno nasilje da to i prijave.
Nije prvi put da televizija sa nacionalnom frekvencijom učestvuje u sekundarnoj viktimizaciji onih koji su prijavili seksualno nasilje, širenju govora mržnje i mizoginije. Najvidljiviji primer predstavlja izveštavanje medija nakon što je glumica i rediteljka Danijela Štajnfeld u Višem javnom tužilaštvu izjavila da ju je silovao njen tadašnji kolega Branislav Lečić. TV Happy, Srpski telegraf i Alo, izveštavali su na veoma senzacionalistički način, prebacujući krivicu na onu koja je prijavila silovanje i širili teorije zavere i time doprinosili sekundarnoj viktimizaciji osobe koja je podnela optužbu za silovanje.
Napominjemo da je ovakvom vrstom izveštavanja emiter prekršio više odredbi iz pravilnika o zaštiti ljudskih prava u oblasti pružanja medijskih usluga, a pre svega odredbu iz člana 26 u kome se eksplicitno kaže da je prilikom informisanja o nasilju ili tragičnom događaju pružalac medijske usluge dužan da to čini na način kojim se neće povrediti dostojanstvo ličnosti žrtve nasilja ili tragičnog događaja ili njoj bliskog lica, a naročito na način kojim se ona neće izložiti ponovnoj patnji.
S obzirom na to da živimo u patrijahalnom i tradicionalnom društvu, društvu koje ćuti na mizogino ponašanje, progovoriti o seksualnom nasilju zahteva izuzetnu hrabrost.
Samim tim, mediji koji izveštavaju o seksualnom nasilju trebalo bi da budu upoznati sa prirodom traume i da izveštavaju bez seksizma, predrasuda i senzacionalizma. Takođe, trebalo bi da izveštavaju objektivno i da pruže prostor u kome će se žrtve seksualnog nasilja osetiti bezbedno da govore o svom iskustvu. Netačno izveštavanje i neosetljivost prema žrtvama može doprineti njihovoj retraumatizaciji, a pružajući siguran prostor jednoj žrtvi, ohabriće i druge da progovore o svojim traumama.
Način na koji mediji izveštavaju o seksualnom nasilju utiče na oblikovanje uverenja javnosti o ovoj temi i može rezultirati značajnim posledicama po pojedince i društvo u celini. Zato je važno da mediji zapamte da imaju i etičku odgovornosti kada izveštavaju o seksualnom nasilju i da bi trebalo da pruže bezbedan prostor da se o ovakvim temama govori bez predrasuda i osuda, čime bi se doprinelo podizanju svesti i rešavanju društvenog problema.
Pozivamo REM da preduzmne sve mere definisane zakonom i podzakoskim aktima koje su im na raspolaganju u ovom slučaju.
Ovo saopštenje zajednički potpisuju:
Institut za medije i različitost – Zapadni Balkan
Autonomni ženski centar (AŽC)
BeFem
IRIDA
Impuls Tutin
Jovana Gligorijević, novinarka
Nezavisno udruženje novinara Srbije (NUNS)
Udruženje Fenomena
Ženska solidarnost
Inicijativa Verujem TI
Photo: Nadia Snopek / Shutterstock