Author: Ivana Jelača
BALKAN TROLL OF THE MONTH: Tahir Batatini, Kosovo Football Coach
May 4, 2021
The Balkan Troll of the Month is an individual, a group of individuals or a media outlet that spreads hate on the internet based on gender, ethnicity, religion, or other diversity categories. The Balkan Troll is selected based on hate speech incidents identified across the Western Balkans region.
Our April Troll is Kosovo football coach Tahir Batatini who showcased sexist behavior on national television in Kosovo towards female journalist Qendresa Krelani.
The incident occurred during the TV show “Sport Total“ on TV Koha Vizioni KTV. The journalist Qendresa Krelani asked Tahir Batatini, football coach of the club Lap: “Mr.Batatini, when you have results such as yours all the time, what are your aims? Batatini answered: “In journalism, you can stack newspapers, or clean something, but not analyse football in this way”. Batatini also added: “Your level is not that of a journalist, starting from your appearance”.
Despite the fact that so far there were no statements such as this one, society in Kosovo is still predominantly patriarchal. Although there are women in sport journalism are , it is still perceived mainly as a male profession. Social media comments related to this incident confirm this.
Just few days after the sexist comments by Tahir Batatini, another sexist and homophobic incident happened, involving Kosovo Imam Shefqet Krasniqi who also appeared on national television to share his views on gender role divisions and other patriarchal viewpoints.
Kosovo 2.0 and Reporting Diversity Network 2.0 article “We Are Barely Scratching the Surface of Sexism in the Media“ by Dafina Halili gave an overview of both incidents while challenging sexism in Kosovar media and the lack of reaction by media organisations more generally.
“One has to be a football expert in order to assess the words of the sports journalist, but Batatina didn’t patronize her for her lack of expertise but for her gender, just as Krasniqi does with all women,” writes Halili, and continues: “Furthermore the hegemonic masculinity of sports and religion traditionally sees women sports journalists, or any women, as unwanted newcomers in the male realm who should have stayed in the kitchen. And the media reproduces exactly that deformed reality within a patriarchal ideology. How media organizations participate in the culture of oppression is best seen through the immediate reaction — or lack of it — from journalists, editors and media owners toward the sexism by Batatina and Krasniqi. One might expect their comments to instantly backfire, but there was minimal reaction from journalists in the studio, or their superiors. “
Marking the World Press Freedom Day, Reporting Diversity Network 2.0 put the spotlight on the diverse challenges that women journalists face in the Western Balkans. The campaign shared the daily struggles and efforts of women journalists from Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, North Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia; from not being treated equally to their male counterparts to being target of sexism comments, threats or brutal campaigns. Women who report on corruption and abuse of power or who try to promote the minority rights tend to face more challenges.
Ahead of World Press Freedom Day, the report “The Chilling: Global trends in online violence against women journalists“ was published and revealed striking findings related to online violence and hate directed towards women journalist. The report is based on a global survey of 901 journalists from 125 countries conducted in five languages; long-form interviews with 173 international journalists, editors, and experts in the fields of freedom of expression, human rights law, and digital safety and two big data case studies assessing over 2.5 million posts on Facebook and Twitter.
The research identifies some worrisome trends, reflected in the findings such as that 64% of all white women journalists surveyed said they had experienced online violence, the rates were higher for those identifying as Black (81%), Indigenous (86%), and Jewish (88%). Similar is found for lesbian and bisexual journalists, where 88% and 85%, respectively, have declared they face online abuse compared to 72% of heterosexual women.
Read the full report published by the International Center for Journalists (ICFJ) and under commission from The United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) here.
HATE SPEECH DURING THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN IN ALBANIA
April 26, 2021
On 25 April, Albania had its parliamentary elections and the current Prime Minister, Edi Rama is set to win as preliminary results show. However, the focus of this article is not the political environment or the results of the elections but what happened during the electoral campaign. By looking at the rhetoric of all sides it is clearer than ever that the electoral campaign was dominated by hate speech. Political hate speech remains one of the most prominent forms of hate speech, particularly during electoral campaigns.
During March, Reporting Diversity Network 2.0 identified several hate speech incidents, which were perpetrated by key political figures in the country. In this article we will refer to the main incidents that drew the attention of the public and the media, and at the same time are important to be addressed. Incidents include the use of hate speech, offensive, derogatory and sexist language, which various political figures used against each other.
The most debated incident of this period was the one that involved the Prime Minister of the country, Edi Rama and the candidate for MP of the Democratic Party, Grida Duma, who have attracted public attention for the use of inappropriate language against each other. More specifically, it has been noted that the Prime Minister, during a direct presentation of his political candidates who will run in the parliamentary elections, introduced them compared to the candidates coming from the opposition party (PD). The photos of the opposition candidates were derogatory, out of context and with sexist content. Particular attention was drawn to the photo he used to represent Grida Duma, which he accompanied with the description “Gridare, Gridare, Gridare ooooo”, which significantly adds sexist tones to the selected image.
On the other hand, reactions with the same language came from representatives of other political parties in the country, such as Grida Duma, who in a post on her FB page shared videos with insulting calls to the Prime Minister. Also, Nora Malaj MP of the SMI in parliament has reacted regarding the Rama-Duma incident, using aggressive contemptuous language (sick, injured hyena, etc.). On the other hand, it is noted the use of hate speech language against various representatives of civil society, pointing the finger on those who did not react to the incident.
A response to the incident came in the form of a public call from 24 civil society organizations, which called for the ban on the use of hate speech against women in politics. Their call was addressed to political entities, the media, as well as the Commissioner for Protection from Discrimination.
This incident in particular, but also the massive use of hate speech during the election campaign prompted the reaction of the Head of the European Union Delegation in Tirana, Luigi Soreca, who in a public statement recalled the “importance of constructive and comprehensive political dialogue…that is based on mutual respect, dialogue and restraint, and is conducted in a peaceful manner, without provocative rhetoric or hate speech. ” In the same line with the EU delegation stand the recommendations of the Commissioner for Protection from Discrimination and the Central Election Commission, which in particular emphasize the “prevention of hate speech during the election campaign”, both by political parties and their supporters, as well as by the media which “should refuse to cover election campaigns that use or support hate speech.”
It is worth noting that, even when the media and journalists do not directly use hate speech in what they publish, they amplify the hate speech that politicians use by reporting on those incident and constantly repeating their narratives in violation of the Code of Ethics. Reporting and coverage of these incidents by media professionals should be done responsibly, accompanied by the necessary explanations and critical reflections on the context, in order to contribute to reducing hate speech, not spreading and increasing it.
Author: Dorentina Hysa
Photo credit: Andrij Vatsyk/ Shutterstock
WE ARE BARELY SCRATCHING THE SURFACE OF SEXISM IN THE MEDIA
April 21, 2021
THREE HIGH PROFILE INCIDENTS IN A WEEK ARE PART OF A DEEPER-ROOTED PROBLEM.
Three men walk into a bar: A sports trainer, a religious leader and a media owner, reads the script. With pretentious smiles and flamboyant steps they make their way to a free table.
The waiter approaches them and asks what they would like to drink.
They notice the bar has the drink from the TV ad that features the text: “For men, not for boys.”
“Shweppes,” they answer uniformly.
The waiter brings them the requested beverage and with straws in their mouths they look around and move their heads to the rhythm of the background music. Soon, they begin a coordinated lip sync, half whispering a verse of a song by the hip-hop trio Lyrical Son, Mc Kresha dhe Ledri Vula:
Ti menon që munesh ndamas (You think you can make it on your own)
Po s’munesh as tanga me ble pa mu (But you cannot even buy your underwear)
Le mo Louis e ksi gjana (Let alone Louis [Vuitton] and such things)
Për ty janë tema t’randa me i bo (They are heavy topics for you)
Their attention to the music is interrupted by laughter from a group of three women on the table opposite them. The three men try to make eye contact, but their attempts to flirt are ignored.
Unperturbed, they make a second attempt to get attention, shouting some inexplicable words, Johnny Bravo style. Still, they are completely ignored by the three women.
Suddenly the sports trainer says: “These women are only good for stacking empty bottles and cleaning things in the kitchen.”
The religious leader nods his approval: “You’re totally right, dude! A woman’s place is in the kitchen.”
The media owner raises his eyebrows and smiles:
“Come on guys, don’t be like that. I can find prettier women than them and bring them as a gift to you at this table.”
The script ends with a note: Based on true events, inspired by the Albanian language media.
* * *
The scene painted above might seem like some kind of cheap joke. But it is far too close to everyday reality to be funny.
In recent days, three prominent names — football coach, Tahir Batatina, one of the leaders of Kosovo’s Muslim community, Shefqet Krasniqi, and media veteran Baton Haxhiu — have become the latest protagonists of blatant, deliberate, misogynistic slurs, with two of them taking place on prime time TV.
The reactions of some individual journalists, activists and other citizens have ensured their words have been met with a fierce backlash. Many have also criticized the media moderators, journalists and owners for enabling the space to guests such as Krasniqi, who is known for spreading gender intolerance and sexist remarks.
But, even if all media outlets took editorial decisions to never again invite men into their studios who had previously contributed to misogynistic narratives in the press toward women, it would only scratch the surface of a deeply rooted problem: The power of patriarchy in the heart of media culture.
Prime time discrimination
Let’s look at the real TV script from the past week.
On April 11, on KTV sports show “Sporti Total,” the RTK journalist Qendresa Krelani criticized football manager and current coach of Llapi, Batatina, suggesting that supporters had lost trust in him as a coach and asking where he was heading with his team’s recent poor results.
“In journalism, you can stack newspapers, or clean something, but not analyze football in this way,” Batatina replied. “Your level is not that of a journalist, starting from your appearance…”
The sexist and offensive remarks were denounced by the Association of Journalists of Kosovo, and also by the Association of Sports Journalists, while the Football Federation of Kosovo’s Disciplinary Committee has opened a disciplinary procedure against the coach.
IT WASN’T LONG BEFORE THEY WERE FORCED TO MOVE ON WITH THEIR CRITIQUE TO THE THIRD HIGH PROFILE INCIDENT OF THE WEEK.
But Batatina had already become old news by the following day when the Imam Shefqet Krasniqi decided to share his own views on women. Invited onto one of the most watched evening shows, RTV Dukagjini’s “Debat Plus me Ermal Pandurin,” to talk about solidarity during Ramadan, he instead used the space provided to him to do what sexist and homophobic pundits do best: He fed into the narrative of segregated gender roles and the dominance of a patriarchal order.
“Religion shows everybody their place: Men belong in the oda — the oda is for men. One should make another oda for women,” he suggested. “Men can learn from men and women from women. When they are mixed together, one cannot tell anymore who is a man and who is a woman … a woman goes to war but she cannot fight as a man. A woman has the tools, but she cannot use them as men do.”
Krasniqi faced strong criticism, particularly from various circles. But, in exhaustion, it wasn’t long before they were forced to move on with their critique to the third high profile incident of the week.
While the Imam was talking about how the world needs to exist in a segregated, gendered composition, veteran journalist Baton Haxhiu — who now owns the Albanian Post and is a frequent political analyst in Albania — was doing environmental analysis.
The former director of KLAN TV in Kosovo said that Albania does not have to listen to the calls of foreigners, including Leonardo di Caprio, who have appealed to the government to declare the Vjosa River and its surroundings a “National Park.” Instead, he suggested other actions.
“Find a gorgeous girl for Leonardo di Caprio and offer her to him [on the table], and tell him this is a gift, but do not bring other topics to the table.”
Media reinforcing a patriarchal narrative
The sentences so easily rolled out by Batatina, Krasniqi and Haxhiu form an objectifying and oppressive lense toward women and are exactly the dominant ideas that are reproduced and maintained as standard with the aid of the daily media production.
One has to be a football expert in order to assess the words of the sports journalist, but Batatina didn’t patronize her for her lack of expertise but for her gender, just as Krasniqi does with all women.
Furthermore the hegemonic masculinity of sports and religion traditionally sees women sports journalists, or any women, as unwanted newcomers in the male realm who should have stayed in the kitchen. And the media reproduces exactly that deformed reality within a patriarchal ideology.
How media organizations participate in the culture of oppression is best seen through the immediate reaction — or lack of it — from journalists, editors and media owners toward the sexism by Batatina and Krasniqi. One might expect their comments to instantly backfire, but there was minimal reaction from journalists in the studio, or their superiors.
HAVE YOU EVER STOPPED TO CONSIDER: FROM WHOSE PERSPECTIVE IS THE STORY?
And their action and lack of it sends a message: Here we provide a platform for outright gender discrimination. That galling message is strengthened by media that do not filter hate speech from comments on their websites, helping to stoke the fire of misogynistic scorn aimed at Krelani, the sports journalist, and other women.
Even when gendered jobs and roles are challenged by women themselves, the stereotypes remain and are reinforced in editorial decisions.
Women’s voices, or those of anybody who is not an Albanian, heterosexual man, are widely lacking from core positions in media settings and organizations, which continue to depict public life as a male domain. For example the vast majority of political scientists and commentators are men, while women are more often invited to talk about social issues, health and education that are marginalized from front pages or prime time shows.
Patriarchy dominates the news. Such discrimination against women and their experiences is manifested not only in the use of language, but also in the angle of stories. Have you ever stopped to consider: From whose perspective is the story? Who is included and who is excluded? How many of those I’m seeing or hearing from are women?
Now, with this in mind, let’s look again at Krasniqi’s suggestion that women are not for war. It is hardly the first time we have come across such an assertion in recent years. Since the end of the war in Kosovo, in a media landscape dominated by men, we have continuously replicated Krasniqi’s words with women’s portrayal as passive victims. This excludes them from their agency and contributes to reinforcing the narrative of war and liberation written and led by men.
Gender representation in media reflects a constructed reality that is the result of various thoughts and decisions made by media workers who articulate similar messages to those of Batatina, Krasniqi and Haxhiu.
WHILE THE SCRIPT HAS LONG BECOME OLD, WE CANNOT AFFORD TO SIMPLY TURN THE CHANNEL.
The latter’s comments are particularly deplorable, because as a man who has long held an influential role in the Albanian language media landscape, he sent a public message that institutionalized sexism is here to dominate.
With his casual inference toward sex trafficking, Haxhiu normalized the objectification of women, suggesting that they exist simply to be subordinated and oppressed — but not as agents of social change. It was a stark reminder that we are still a long way from seeing serious discussion of public policies to tackle gender-based violence, discrimination or social injustice in such prime time slots.
But while the script has long become old, we cannot afford to simply turn the channel. The majority of clickbait media may do their best to uphold the patriarchal reality, but until news organizations represent a feminist perspective we must continue to speak out.
This article was originally produced for and published by Kosovo 2.0. It has been re-published here with permission.
Author: Dafina Halili, K2.0 contributing editor, covering mainly human rights and social justice issues. Dafina has a master’s degree in diversity and the media from the University of Westminster in London, U.K..
Photo credit: Arrita Katona / K2.0
“YOUNG&DIVERSE” PODCAST WITH SELMA SELMAN – “I have to serve as a role model and that means that I cannot fail”
April 8, 2021
Selma Selman is an artist from Bosnia and Herzegovina. She incorporates her creativity, but also identity aspects into her artwork. Being part of a Roma family that earns their living from collecting and selling iron, Selma uses iron and reusable materials in her art. In her show Mercedes Matrix breaks a Mercedes car with the help of her family in front of an audience in order to question labour and capitalism in Roma settings and beyond. The Selman family wrote “Selma Selman is Tito” – referring to the Yugoslav leader – on their family van to point out the solidarity spirit and power she brings to their village. Selma owns Selma Selman studio in Bosnia and helps young Roma girls to obtain necessary education through her foundation.
Selman says that as a Roma woman she has been targeted by a lot of hate speech. Selman’s approach to combating hate is to ignore it to the point when haters become conscious of their own unhappiness.
This episode of the podcast “Young and Diverse” is created in cooperation with the podcast Celebrate Life and local artist from North Macedonia, Goran Kostovski- Indog. You can listen to the full episode here.
This pandemic has changed the world. Marginalized communities have been ignored. Kids were not able to attend school because of the lack of computers. Recently you made your own studio and with your last project “Get the Hack to School“you did a lot for the local community. Can you tell more about this project?
Thinking about the pandemic makes me think about the situation of Roma people, before and now. And the reality is that Roma people were always in a trouble, even before the pandemic, but now it is even worse. There was never a good situation where Roma people could live normally and with the pandemic it is much worse.
And in regards to that I realised that I have to create something; a cultural institution in my village because such a thing doesn’t exist there. I realised that I am going to open and build my studio as a place where everyone, not restricted to Roma, can come, borrow a book, borrow a laptop, ask for information they need. This is a place that serves for education and emancipation.
Talking about this, my project “Get the Hack to School” which started in 2017 is actually funding firstly girls with full scholarships. The reason why I am targeting girls is because I want all of these girls from my village to have elementary school [education]. This is somethings which I think is a human right for every child and for Roma girls. This foundation is not restricted only to Roma girls. I am also giving scholarships to boys. From 2017 to 2020 we were giving out school lunches, but because of the pandemic we had to stop this because it was not safe.
For now I can say that we did a lot of progress with this small help. (…)For example now we have one girl who enrolled into Law school, one girl is studying art school, 2 boys into high school and all other kids to primary school.
As much as this is beautiful to do at the same time is very hard for me. I have to serve as a [role] model. Being a [role] model means that you cannot fail. It means that you always must show them that education is the right way to have a normal and good life. At the same time you always have to have the trust from those girls that you wish the best to them. Since the Roma people were traumatised by the white people, where the white people were using them whether to get funds or some things from them, Roma people started to assume that even someone who is coming from their own community is also trying to abuse them. This is why this is a big challenge for me to gain the trust. I can say that I really have huge respect for my community and family.
In one interview for the Macedonian feminist festival Prvo pa Zensko (First Born Girl), you state that the Roma are the planet’s leading social, ecological and technological futurists. Roma people have been recycling for many years and earned a living from this, while the Western world only a few years ago started to become aware of recycling plastics as a benefit. How to overcome those narratives in the Balkans in which Roma are just perceived as collectors of plastics for their own survival- but often people miss to see the great ecological contribution they have with this job?
For many years, people who were collecting iron, scrap metal or plastic were perceived as people who were working undervalued labor. It was not interesting 100 years ago to collect this stuff, because people didn’t think about ecology so much. The funny and at the same time beautiful thing is that Roma people were unconscious that they were helping themselves, but also to the world.
You speak in many ways through your art as a Roma woman, you relate to your origins in Bosnia despite being famous worldwide, bringing close connections to how your family lives and works. In your exhibition Mercedes Matrix you question the concepts of labor, survival, economic struggles and daily living of Roma families. Can you elaborate on Mercedes Matrix exhibition?
To be honest my family really loves to participate in my show. They like that they can be paid more. The interesting part for the Mercedes Matrix show in 2019 was that this was the first time I did a public performance with my family.
Mercedes Matrix was the intro into collective performances with my family. They told me that when they do this performances with me it is totally different situation and circumstances in the art world. They said that when they usually do this work at home, breaking cars on a daily basis doesn’t represent anything more than a job that gives you money. And this job does not represent a value. You don’t get any value for this job. You are perceived as an iron picker and nothing else. But when they were transformed into these circumstances in the art world they felt proud of what they do. This was the first time for them that they have been recognized.
You have a picture in your family van that says “Selma Selman is Tito“. What is that about?
People always told me that Tito is not a woman. The fact is that Tito, in the former Yugoslavia, represented someone who had the power- the power to lead the nation. Regardless of the troubles and problems in which Yugoslavia went. I think that Tito represented power and this is what I represent to my village.
For many Balkan countries, the rule of “hate silence“ in the media applies to many community groups including the Roma community. In this case, hate is not expressed through the discourse or reporting, but through ignoring and staying silent. For what problems that concern the Roma community in the Balkans do the media stay silent?
The media has a big role [to play]. Any media, but especially social media. They have to be really conscious of what they do. I know from my personal experience. I get a lot of hate from white people. I am on all social media and all media in Bosnia. People like to interview me. I use the media and interviews in order to say something clever for them. I give interviews to those portals who are read by haters and those who are read by educated people. From those people who read those, I would say, “cheap“ portals and magazines you get a lot of hate. You can see how much time they have to actually share the hate. On one of my interviews I got 300 comments which are all about hate. The hate always existed and stereotypes based on anything. In order to fight that you show them how successful you can be and not react to their stupidity.
It is really easy to hate. Who are those people that decide on what someone else has to do and they instantly hate? Why do people hate?
It is a really great philosophical question. Why [do] people hate? At the same time why people love? It is the same. It is just like yin-yang. The darkness exists in the happiness and the happiness exists in the darkness. We need to find the balance and the balance is the hardest to achieve. People who hated you that means that they are not satisfied with themselves and the only way to feel a little bit happier is if they make you sad. We live in a world where many people are unhappy, because of the government, because of the salaries, because of the money, the law… I cannot even judge these people. The only way how to fight it is to just let it go. Then, they themselves will maybe die in hate or be unhappy all their life.
What would you recommend to the young people in the Balkans?
Maybe I can say something through me, what I have learned through all this experiences with travelling, working, troubles, living in underprivileged circumstances and making myself visible. The only thing which helped to build myself is that I never perceived myself [as being]different as people would call me. I always perceived [myself] normal and equal to others. I never perceived myself as not being able to do something. I always viewed that if I want something I can really do it regardless of how much time it is going to take, but it is going to happen. For me, I don’t believe in the hard work, but in the clever and smart work, making strategy and thinking about what I really want. Once you realize what you really want, you will realize that being proud on your national identity doesn’t make sense. Being proud of your country doesn’t make sense. Country is an invented terminology. I think that the only tactic for me to succeed is this normalization, that I am normal, no smarter than other, not more stupid than other, just me.
All of us who were born underprivileged, we all went through similar experiences of discrimination. The facts is that these forms of discrimination still exist today.
The only way to fight haters is [not feeling pity for] yourself and not showing them how vulnerable you are. It is the hardest thing to do. How do you stay calm when someone is bullying you? I didn’t have a lot of friends in elementary school. Even though I was white, I was still perceived as dirty and black in the school. Then I realized when I was getting the best grades, people started to perceive me as normal. This was my strategy.
Editor’s note: This is an edited version of Selma Selman’s interview. You can listen to the whole interview on Spotify’s Ancor. Some parts were edited for more clarity.
Photo credit: Selma Selman Instagram Profile
Monthly Monitoring Highlight: Ethnic hate speech and narratives of divide
April 6, 2021
Throughout March, Reporting Diversity Network monitoring team has detected several incidents related to xenophobia and hate speech based on ethnicity in the Western Balkan media. Hate speech was spread by politicians, influential figures, and other public figures. While there is a consistency in spreading hateful rhetoric targeting migrants and refugees, media representation of the Roma community does not exist, which is known as “hate silence“.
Genocide denial by Montenegro Minister of Justice
The Minister of Justice in Montenegro, Vladimir Leposavic, indirectly denied the genocide in Srebrenica by challenging the legitimacy of the Hague Tribunal, which recognised it as a genocide. “I am ready to admit that the crime of genocide was committed in Srebrenica when it is unequivocally established”, he said. According to Leposavic, the Hague Tribunal has lost its credibility. Leposavic specifically said:
“The Hague tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, in addition to being established by a resolution instead of an international treaty, almost completely lost its legitimacy when it was established that the evidence of the Council of Europe rapporteur on the extraction and trafficking of organs of Serb civilian victims in Kosovo was destroyed in that court.”
The US Embassy in Montenegro, but also domestic representatives of political parties, CSOs and activists urged the government to hold Leposavic accountable for his words. Emir Suljagic, Director of Srebrenica Memorial Center warned of the possible ethnic intolerance and violence inspired by such rhetoric. He tweeted: “With this government in Montenegro, I cannot exclude organised violence towards Bosnians in Montenegro in the near future. To start with, through ‘paramilitary’ formations. The signal for violence will come from the country”.
Montenegrin Prime Minister Zdravko Krivokapić, however, stated that the government respects the Declaration of Acceptance of the European Parliament resolution adopted by the Parliament of Montenegro in 2009, which condemns the genocide in Srebrenica committed in 1995, and all other war crimes committed during the conflict in the former Yugoslavia.
Part of the public in Montenegro urged Minister Leposavic to resign due to his statements, which he did not do.
Mixed ethnic marriages to discredit political opponents in the political scene in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Faruk Kapidzic, former Minister at Sarajevo Canton Government and current Chairman of the National Commission for Monuments, posted a Facebook status in which he aimed to discredit deputy mayor candidate, Ivana Maric. He accused the voters of the opponent parties as responsible for voting Maric. He described all voters as naive.
“Naive believers and members of the Islamic Community, as well as new businessmen who voted for People and Justice (political party), are also to blame for that. And everyone from working class and mixed marriages and supporters of socialist and realist ideologies who voted for the SDP (political party) are also to blame.“
Kapidzic shared the status on his Facebook profile, but many media outlets shared the status. He was afterwards invited in several media to explain himself why mixed marriages were mentioned in his Facebook status on which he answered that the does not understand why the media found that problematic as he listed all voters.
Ethnicity in ethnically mixed Bosnia and Herzegovina, and ethnically mixed marriages in particular, are a very sensitive topic. This is not something that should be utilised in political purposes and risk adding to an existing divides in the society.
Racist coverage of COVID-19 in Albanian media
Four websites in Albania published a segment of a video that labels COVID-19 as a Chinese virus which brought a lot of hateful comments on the Internet. Articles show a short video with an old patient in hospital who is sharing his experience of hisCOVID-19 battle in an interview. Instead of showing the entire interview, the portals included only the 12-seconds video segment where the racial hate speech is articulated. Headlines on the portals included this one: “Hospital patient Shefqet Ndroqi, shares his battle with COVID-19: “I prefer dying from God rather than those sons of a bitch – the Chinese”.
Clickbait headlines and mal-intended usage of video interview in this case is very problematic as it is targeting Chinese people (since the virus originated in China) rather than warning of the possible consequences of COVID-19 and the need to respect preventive measures. It also influences public discussion, as evidenced in the readers’ comments, without bringing the needed benefit – care for public health.
Nationalist narratives in a popular Serbian TV talk show
Reporting Diversity Network selected Ivan Ivanovic, host of the TV talk show “Evening with Ivan Ivanovic“ as the Balkan Troll of the Month. Ivanovic used his episode 593 as a space to spread nationalist narratives by calling Podgorica, the capital of Montenegro, a Serbian village. Later during the show, he made a sexist comment about women from Montenegrin town Ulcinj.
RDN members, Media Diversity Institute Western Balkans and Center for Investigative Journalism-Montenegro jointly expressed their concerns on the rise of nationalism in Serbian and Montenegrin media. In addition politicians in those two countries, where nationalism is present in the daily life, are creating this atmosphere. At the same time narratives of division, that are fed by nationalism, are very present in the media of both Serbia and Montenegro. Jovana Marovic from Politikon Network and Nikola Burazer from European Western Balkans warn of the rise of nationalism in both countries and that those nationalist narratives complement and strengthen each other. This has a potential to negatively influence good neighborly relations in the Balkans.
Xenophobia and anti-migrant narratives
Xenophobia and narratives that are targeting migrants and refugees are present across the Western Balkans and throughout March, RDN monitoring uncovered problematic narratives in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia. These narratives, that predominantly represent refugees and migrants as a security threat, appear in traditional media as well as on social media.
In Bosnia and Herzegovina, the antimigrant.ba portal, which was RDN 2.0 February Troll, continues to spread anti-migrant feelings with headlines such as “Take migrant intruders to your countries, don’t feed them in ours”.
In Albania, migrants are depicted as a threat to society. “Stop the migrants that are threatening Albanian families” is just one of the anti-migrant messages in the media.
YouTube and other social media can be a source of problematic discourse about ‘the other’. That is the case in Serbia where the leader of Narodna Patrola (People Patrole), an informal group that is ‘protecting’ people from migrants, gave an interview to the YouTube channel ‘Mario zna’ (Mario knows). In the interview he claimed that some countries have ” “intentionally released prisoners into the migrant crisis” and that “(migrants) are an organised army that came to cause destabilization”.
Many other misleading and unfounded statements were part of the YouTube video which, at the time of the writing, had over 22 thousand views and obvious potential to influence opinion and attitudes of citizens towards the migrant and refugee community.
“Hate silence”
While media outlets give an open platform for spreading divisive narratives, there seems to be no space for the problems of local members of the Roma community. Despite of Roma being large ethnic minority across the Balkans they are rarely portrayed in the media.
RDN members call this hate silence, as in this case, hate is not expressed through the discourse or portrayal, but through ignoring and staying silent. MDI has already raised issue around lack of media discussion on discrimination of Roma people in the media in Serbia, however, the situation is relatively similar in other Western Balkan countries as well.
Reporting Diversity Network 2.0 stresses that the media landscape should be free from the narratives of ethnic divide. Furthermore, we urge the media outlets, journalists and media representatives to break the “hate silence“ for certain ethnic minorities such as the Roma community and contribute towards more frequent and accurate representation of life and challenges of Roma people.
BALKAN TROLL OF THE MONTH: Ivan Ivanovic, a TV Host from Serbia
March 31, 2021
The Balkan Troll of the Month is an individual, a group of individuals or a media outlet that spreads hate on the internet based on gender, ethnicity, religion, or other diversity categories. The Balkan Troll is selected based on hate speech incidents identified across the Western Balkans region.
Our March Troll is Ivan Ivanovic, a TV host from Serbia. Ivan Ivanovic hosts the show ‘Evening with Ivan Ivanovic’ which is one of the most popular TV shows in the country. In episode 593, RDN monitors detected nationalist and sexist narratives towards Montenegrins. The episode was aired on 26 February 2021 on the TV stations Nova S, Nova BH and afterwards published on the TV show’s own Youtube channel. At the time of the writing the episode has a little less than 100,000 views on YouTube only.
In his show, Ivan Ivanovic called Podgorica a Serbian village. Ivanovic joked by saying “Serbian villages have a future. For example, Podgorica.” In the second part of his joke he attempted to explain his joke due to a word play in the Serbian language and he said that he meant the football team Buducnost (translated: future) from Podgorica. Ivanovic ended his joke only by saying “I am kidding. Greetings to our brothers in Podgorica“.
Ivanovic’s statement is offensive for Montenegro and its citizens as it denies the identity of people of Montenegro, their state and nation, by calling them Serbian and furthermore naming their capital “a village”.
Later during the show, Ivanovic made a joke about women from the Montenegrin town, Ulcinj. He referred to a Danish girl named Eldina who grows her mustache and eyebrows so that men would stop constantly flirting with her. Having said that, he added, “Apparently, she’s never been to Ulcinj”. This commentary is an obvious sexist remark, directed towards Montenegrin women.
This is not the first time Ivanovic has made problematic statements that were not welcomed by part of his audience. In 2014, one of the jokes he made was about underage rape victims in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Although he issued an apology in the next episode, this remains a proof that humor in the media requires a lot of thinking and professional and ethical approach. Despite his explanation that he, by no means, had bad intentions, many of his jokes, aired on TV with national coverage, and framed as ‘harmless’ humor, have been bordering with sexism and other types of stereotypes as well as usage of terminology that cannot be considered politically correct.
Humour as a dangerous zone where hateful narratives are widely spread
While humour is welcomed on television talk shows as a powerful tool, the above-mentioned examples are neither humourous nor part of a stand-up comedy performance. Such narratives can be considered offensive, and Ivan Ivanovic gave them a platform and visibility through his very popular TV show. This type of humor does not transform or deconstruct some of the omnipresent divisive narratives in the Balkans, instead, it further perpetuates conflicts in the Balkans and brings those narratives closer to younger generations and those who should be detached from divisions.
Many bloggers and media figures successfully use humor and satire as part of tackling some of the global problems that the world is facing. However, there is one important question: is the price of making someone laugh worth using humor that is targeting ‘the other’? By other we mean either a group in the society (such as jokes about ‘Cige’ as Ivanovic calls Roma people in some of his jokes) or in the Western Balkan neighborhood (like Montenegro in this case).
Rise of nationalist narratives in Montenegro and Serbia
RDN monitors have detected several incidents related to nationalist narratives in the media in both countries. Many of these examples from both Serbian and Montenegrin media are denying the existence of Montenegro as a state and nation. These narratives are spread by politicians and influential figures as well as media.
“Nationalism in both countries is equally important. They influence and strengthen each other. This is a result of the politics by the political parties that works in their own interests. When they cannot offer sustainable policies and sustainable solutions, they (political parties) still play on the identity card, which is highly problematic”- says Jovana Marovic from Politikon Network. Marovic and Nikola Burazer from European Western Balkans elaborate more on the nationalist discourses in Serbian and Montenegrin society in the video interview made by RDN 2.0 members Media Diversity Institute Western Balkans and Center for Investigative Journalism- Montenegro. The video is available in local languages.
If you want to learn more about how media should report on ethnicity, read more in the “Getting the Facts Right: Reporting Ethnicity and Religion“ case study. The case study and other useful resources are available on RDN website resources page.
SERBIA’S METOO MOMENT AND THE BATTLE BETWEEN DIGITAL AND MAINSTREAM MEDIA
March 12, 2021
One year after the global pandemic started, we can see how COVID-19 gripped the world. In terms of violence against women and girls, the pandemic had a devastating effect. Although there is no official data, women organisation helplines have reported a significant rise in cases of violence against women, and the Republic of Serbia was no exception.
Two years after the #MeToo movement rippled through the world, we would expect that media reporting shifted from the victim blaming narrative to one that empowers women to speak out. But in the local Serbian media landscape, coloured by its history in the ‘90s when media reporting amplified the crisis during the decline of Yugoslavia, as well as the ongoing economic crisis, not much has changed on the way women are treated. This was evident in the case of Milena Radulovic, one brave actress who dared to call out her drama teacher, Miroslav Mika Aleksic of sexual assault. At the beginning of 2021, Milena Radulovic accused Miroslav Mika Aleksic of repetitive sexual violence and rape. She was not alone. Within three weeks, seven more young women and girls spoke up. During the last eight years, Aleksic reportedly raped and sexually harassed at least eight of his students, more than 18 times.
In the Republic of Serbia, the media had the power to constitute our world in the past by influencing public opinion to a degree that people believed everything that was said or written. The ‘90s showed us that what we see on TV or read in the newspapers has the potential to be more real than our actual, experienced existence. In the context of the civil war and the decline of Yugoslavia, mainstream media counterfeited the reality and formed a strong public opinion, which worked in favour of the nationalist agenda. The same thing almost got repeated during COVID-19 lockdowns, until people went to the streets and started to protest over a government announcement of the re-implementation of curfews. While mainstream media marked protesters as terrorists, the digital media, social media primarily, was used as the voice of the people, as the voice of reason. Moreover, social media helped protesters coordinate the protests and evade the beatings and illegal arrests by police.
Six months after the summer protests, social media did the same, in the above-mentioned case of accused serial rapist Miroslav Mika Aleksic. Unfortunately, the mainstream media also followed the previously shown incompetence to accurately report on the current events and distort our reality. The media covers opened a space for questioning Milena Radulovic’s and other women’s motives for reporting Aleksic years after the violence occured and usage of a persuasive victim blaming narrative in the comment sections, based on the rape culture’s “she was asking for it”. Sadly, the defenders of rape culture, both men and women, were given a platform on the national frequency television channels to further distort the truth.
In other words, just as the mainstream media reporting in the ‘90s fabricated public opinion concerning the dissolution of Yugoslavia, the mainstream media in Aleksic’s case tried to do the same. But there is one important difference. While the mainstream media, controlled by the government, in the ‘90s tried to preserve the ruling order, in the post transition era of free and democratic media the commercial motive shaped the tone and angle of reporting. In this particular case, as well as in other cases of reporting on sexual violence, the conservative and patriarchal agenda went hand in hand with the greed for profit. The click-bait headlines such as “Horror school of drama! Details revealed!”, or those with detailed description of rape leaked from the police files and prosecutor’s office, illustrate this very well.
The local women group “Journalists against violence against women” made a set of Guidelines on Media Reporting on Violence against Women, and the mainstream Serbian media, trying to attract the readers and widen its audience, while empowering the dominant patriarchal narrative, violated each and every one of them. Media reporting consisted of Milena Radulovic and her family’s personal information; justification of Aleksic’s behaviour by his authoritative and strict personality was often used; the details of the rape and sexual harassment were openly published on the front covers; stereotypical expressions and images were used in reporting so in the public sphere the responsibility was shifted from Aleksic to his victims, followed by questioning the survivors’ behaviour with ill-informed comments such as, “How can someone be raped multiple times? There was no rape but voluntary intercourse!”.
But similar to the 2020 COVID-19 protests, the digital media, especially the social media and netizens, struck a counterweight. The social media and digital media platforms were used as a place where grassroots movements started and grew. While mainstream media articles reporting created a space for public discussion on the reasons why survivors stayed silent for years and justification of them with “they were asking for it” arguments, the netizens organised at least two important initiatives to support the survivors and prevent future violence – You Are Not Alone, You Were Not Asking For It (Nisi Sama, Nisi Tražila) and No Means No (Ne Znači Ne).
The first one, You Are Not Alone, You Were Not Asking For It, is similar to the MeToo movement, with small adjustments to the local context. Women and girls shared their experiences but also started a social change movement. Students around the Balkans, from Bosnia and Herzegovina to Serbia and Croatia, formed micro movements in their local communities, demanding the right to be safe from sexual harassment at the Universities. Some of them were not students any more, but established professionals, who spoke up about sexual harassment which happened decades ago, such as actress Hasija Boric. Students form Novi Sad, Serbia, as well as their colleagues from Zagreb, Croatia, wrote an open letter and demanded establishing the Act against sexual harassment at their Universities and/or punishing the perpetrators who avoided justice for years, and in some cases, for decades. Just like MeToo, You Are Not Alone, You Were Not Asking For It, gave women a voice. The digital media provided the platform and space for their voices to be heard.
The second initiative, No Means No, is oriented to the prevention of sexual harassment. Few years ago, the non governmental organization Incest Trauma Centre, made a set of educational packages intended for kindergartens and elementary schools. The aim of this packages was to teach children what sexual harassment is and to equip them with knowledge to recognize it. But under the pressure of the conservative current, amplified by mainstream media reporting, they were withdrawn. After Aleksic’s case, the No Means No initiative started a petition for implementing it again, and more than 10.000 people, as well as numerous NGOs, supported and signed this petition.
On the Net, netizens were united in their efforts to challenge the dominant narrative, shaped by mainstream media reporting enthroned in a race for profit and strong conservative and patriarchal standpoints. As disappointing as it may be, the way Serbian mainstream media reported on Milena Radulovic’s case was not a surprise. They did the same five years ago, when singer Jelena Marijanovic was killed. However, the netizens’ engagement did surprise us all, especially after a dreadful year spent in the fear of an ongoing pandemic. Netizens gave us hope. The battle between digital and mainstream media may not end anytime soon, but for the first time in the Serbian history, the voice of the people, personified in digital and social media initiatives, passed into the leadership and led the way for change in the local media landscape. And nevertheless, this is the voice of survivors.
Author: Hristina Cvetincanin Knezevic
This article was first published at MDI website
Photo credit: FabrikaSimf/ Shutterstock
SEXISM IN THE WESTERN BALKANS: Monthly monitoring highlight
March 9, 2021
Throughout February, Reporting Diversity Network’s monitoring team discovered more than 20 incidents related to sexist and misogynist narratives across Western Balkan media that targeted female politicians, journalists and other public figures, perpetuated rape victim-blaming and placed women on usual margins of media reporting and society.
Although we looked at other diversity categories as well, sexism has been a cross cutting issue that was detected in all the countries.
Victim-blaming narratives in Serbian media in case of sexual harassment
The confession of actress Milena Radulovic that she was repeatedly raped by her acting teacher, renowned Serbia actor Miroslav Aleksic, divided the region.
Despite the great support Milena Radulovic and other girls that decided to speak out received from some media and particularly civil society (including MDI WB, RDN member), the case also showed that patriarchal norms are still deeply rooted in the society.
There were several incidents in the Serbian media that perpetuated continuous targeting and victimisation of women and further spread of victim blaming narratives. In the TV show “Posle Rucka“ on the Serbian national television ‘TV Happy’ the audience was asked to comment on Milena Radulovic case and one of the comments was that “there is no rape without panties being ripped off”. The Serbian national daily Alo went even further in involving citizens in sharing their opinion when they published a public poll on their online platform for people to vote if Aleksic was guilty or not, as if the Jurisdiciary is not in charge of deciding about someones responsibility.
Victim blaming narratives came in different forms and from different actors; from citizen’s comments to public figures. They all took part in creating a media space in which sexual predators and aggressors are not held accountable for their actions, but instead the whole burden is placed on victims. Actress Jelena Tinska downplayed rape accusations of actress Milena Radulovic by statements such as “If it is true that he raped her, why did she continue to go in his private school?“ or “Why didn’t she tell her mother?“ that disregard the fact that all of the alledged victims were very young (some of them minor) girls. These problematic statements transform the media into a hostile environment without any red lines. By giving everyone space to debate, harmful speech negatively affects the victims, exemplifies complete lack of recognition for victim support systems and opens new pathways for victim-blaming narratives to be perpetuated further.
Furthermore, the case was, though indirectly, used in case of discrediting a female opposition politician Marinika Tepic, alleging that she might come with accusations that she was raped, as she could be encouraged by the Aleksic case.
Besides the many hateful narratives in the media, women activists created an online support system that has demonstrated empathy, acceptance, normalisation of the rape cases that remain unreported for a number of reasons, including the inability of institutions to appropriately sanction rape. The Facebook page Nisam Trazila (I Didn’t Ask for It) still exists as an online space where thousands of women from all across the Western Balkans share their stories of gender-based violence, rape and trauma, and together create a female unity online.
Online harassment and sexual violence of girls and women in North Macedonia in the “Public Room“ scandal
In North Macedonia around 7,000 male users joined a closed group named “Public Room“ on the communication platform Telegram. The purpose of this group was to share leaked or stolen photographs and contact information from girls and women- including minor girls.
One of the victims whose photos were stolen from her Instagram profile, Ana Koleva has exposed her story in order to further empower victims of online abuse not to blame themselves, but also met Minister of Justice, Bojan Maricik and shared her experience of photographs and information abuse on Telegram as she was haunted with phone calls and messages from unknown men. Ana Koleva was not the only victim whose experience with ‘Public Room’ was totally neglected by the police.
Activists for women’s rights in North Macedonia joined by the general public have been protesting for two months and require the Public Prosecutor to act upon the Public Room case as a criminal offense case that includes several criminal actions: abuse of personal data; facilitating prostitution, threats to women’s personal security, or spread of racist and xenophobic materials, depending on the circumstances of each case within the group.
Female politicians across the Western Balkans target sexist media portrayal and narratives
RDN media monitoring uncovered how women in politics are treaded by the media and public, due to their gender. In Montenegro, Minister of Education, Science, Culture and Sport Vesna Bratic and Minister of Health Bojane Bojovic Borovinic, both women, were depicted in sexist and vulgar caricatures. RDN partner Center for Investigative Journalism-Montenegro publicly condemned these incidents in which female public figures are targets of sexist portrayal in the media. Slavoljub Scekic, Editor in Chief at the Center for Investigative Journalism- Montenegro in the public reaction reminds journalists of the ethnical codex for journalists in which “media should not publish any material that includes hate based on gender“.
Similarly, Vjosa Osmani, Kosovo presidential candidate, has faced verbal insults during the electoral campaign, as well as edited pictures of herself, altering her appearance. There was no reaction from the media, her colleagues in politics, or from representatives of women’s rights organizations (see more in this RDN video).
In these caricatures, women were sexualised and even pictured as submissive to men in order to humiliate the targeted Ministers. The media context in which sexist and misogynist narratives operate are completely dismantling the concrete actions or policies that these politicians might stand for or against, but instead they operate only in the domain of their gender and physical appearance, which aims to make any argument against certain political action discredited by default.
Similarly, female figures in public life are also perceived through their gender and are targets of sexism. Journalist Milka Tadic-Mijovic, President of the Center for Investigative Journalism-Montenegro, member in Reporting Diversity Network, was targeted by sexist hate speech for her statement that “lawsuits against the media and journalists, if well-founded, can contribute to raising standards in journalism and media freedoms.” A local media in Montenegro published an article with a headline “Hypocrisy in Practice: Only the Media Gang can Sue“ in which afterwards Tadic-Mijovic was named as “this biological entity with human shape and female attributes“.
Sexism in popular culture
In the Albanian dance show, “Just Dance“, which is broadcast on a national private television a male member of the jury, used sexist language towards a female participant due to her age. She was told to “go and make babies” indicating that she is old to participate in this sort of competitions and it would be better for her to get married have a family.
Similarly, at the Serbian singing competition show named “Zvezde granda“, two members of the jury (male and female) used sexist language towards a female participant. They were commenting on her physical appearance more than her singing skills. This popular TV show is known for such comments and sexism.
Sexism in such popular shows that are watched by a large amount of people can be particularly influential in people’s perception of gender roles and how women (and men) should look like and behave, at a particular age.
Reporting Diversity Network 2.0 reminds of the need to make the media environment free from sexist and misogynist narratives. On International Women’s Day on 8 March it is more relevant than ever to mention that the media in the Western Balkans must comply with ethical standards that include fair representation of all diversity categories, gender included. We urge the media to create a space in which victims of rape, online harassment, and violence are treated with dignity and respect.
“YOUNG&DIVERSE“ PODCAST WITH HANA CURAK- Feminist meme activist from “Sve su to vještice“
March 8, 2021
In the first podcast produced as part of Reporting Diversity Network 2.0 you can hear Hana Curak talking about patriarchy, sexism, media as well as her activism. Hana Curak is a feminist meme blogger, creator of the meme page “Sve su to vjestice“ (“It’s all witches“), that uses memes in her struggles for gender equality. She is currently based in Berlin, Germany, as a sociology researcher, but originally comes from Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Feminist activist as a response to the patriarchal setting in the Western Balkans
Hana founded the meme page “Sve su to vjestice“ when she was 19 as a response to living in extremely patriarchal setting in the Western Balkans. She was raised in a feminist family which made her realise how much the patriarchy around her seemed ridiculous at that time. Hana has a political stance with here meme activism. When asked what witches mean to Hana, she responds:
“In our post-Yugoslav space “vjestice“or witches basically refers to any woman that doesn’t go in line with patriarchal constellations. For me, the term is very political. A witch can mean many things. It can be something that people identify with magic, but for me it is this extremely political, empowering and feminist term.“
When asked what are the biggest problems for women in the Western Balkans regions, Hana replies “Patriarchy, baby“ referring to her meme with Simone de Beauvoir.
“Our culture is based on trauma primarily and there is a lot of what we have to be careful about and we have to address, and systematically we are not addressing it for 20 years. There is also insistence on tradition, which of course exists elsewhere, but for some reasons here because of (I guess) ethno-national tendencies that are imported and took fertile soil, this became particularly important. From these problems starts violence against women, but other things as well – from small things mentioned in Vjestice memes to really big issues that should be addressed systematically.
Diversifying the male-dominated meme scene
The page “Sve su to vjestice“ and the meme activism started as Hana realised that it was all male humor in the meme scene that developed rapidly around 2010. Her page came as a response to sexism and the memes that, at the time, glorified the male experience, while female experience is left behind. I wanted to make something different.
Hana has her own specific approach when choosing characters for her memes which are both important for her personally but have additional social meaning. Simone de Beauvoir is often featured in her memes, as Hana explains, because of her magnificent facial expression (as well as the fact there is so many images of her) and her historical importance as the most recognised feminist idol.
“In the beginning it all had meaning, there was Marx who represented a specific kind of guy to meet if you are a lefty in Bosnia or Serbia especially. This chauvinist lefty guys. There was Sartre, because of Simon mostly. Virginia Wolf is my favorite character. Reading Virginia’s novels I noticed how funny she was and that resonated with me. I identify with that character the most and I really try to make caricature of myself through that. At some point, I started using other images, but I paid attention to who they were in real life and what I wanted to do with them.“
At the beginning when Hana started with her meme page, she did not have clear idea of who she wanted to target at her specific audience. Later, during her meme activism realised exactly who will be her audience:
“I didn’t knew my page was going to become big. Once it did, I knew I didn’t want to reach the usual suspects. A lot of feminist who were profiling at that point were around me. I always strived to reach people who have no idea what feminism is. Also, people who are against it to a point- but not radically or politically, but just because of ignorance. Most of my audience is young, unemployed moms, a lot of moms in general of all ages, also a lot of girls from Bosnia, Serbia or Croatia who had no idea what I am taking about. This is the most rewarding audience for me.“
Hana believes that the representation of women in media is worrying and that media reflect the patriarchal culture. She recalls the case of Milena Radulovic coming with accusation against her acting teacher who raped her repeatedly which shocked her and reconfirmed the position of women in the media, and in general within societies in the Western Balkans.
Women are still ‘the other’ in the mainstream media and mainstream culture in general, she explains, and when you are regarded as the other there is a number of strategies that people use to persist on you otherness and place you in position of no power.
Listen to the full conversation that Ivana Jovanovic had with Hana Curak on our Young & Diverse podcast.
Photo credit: CROPIX
The podcast, as part of the Reporting Diversity Network 2.0, is funded by the European Union, Balkan Trust for Democracy, a project of the German Marshall Fund of the United States, and the Royal Norwegian Embassy in Belgrade.
The content of the podcast does not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union, Royal Norwegian Embassy, the Balkan Trust for Democracy, the German Marshall Fund of the United States, or its partners.